The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Various Processing Methods on the in Vitro Starch Digestibility and Resistant Starch Content of Indian Pulses
Abstract
The effect of different processing treatments on the in vitro starch digestion rate and resistant starch (RS) formation in two little-known Indian legumes (moth bean and horse gram) as compared with a pulse widely consumed in Asian countries (black gram) was studied. Samples were cooked until edible without previous treatment, after overnight soaking in water or in a 0.02% sodium bicarbonate solution, and after sprouting. Cooked samples were analyzed for their RS content immediately after cooking or after storing for 24 h at 4 °C. The in vitro starch digestion rate was also measured in the freshly cooked (FC) legumes, and the hydrolysis index (HI) and glycemic index (GI) were calculated. RS in processed samples varied between 2.7 and 7.9 g kg -1 of dry matter, the highest values corresponding to the stored legumes. Sprouting and direct cooking resulted in the lowest RS content in FC and stored legumes, respectively. Soaking significantly improved in vitro starch digestibility in the little-known pulses but not in black gram. Sprouting yielded the highest HI and GI. Keywords: Little-known legumes; processing; resistant starch; starch digestibility
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates
Björck, I., Granfeldt, Y., Liljeberg, H., Tovar, J., & Asp, N. (1994) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.3.699s · Cited by 398
Cited by
Starch digestibility in food matrix: a review
Singh, J., Dartois, A., & Kaur, L. (2010) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2009.12.001 · Cited by 989
‘Cooking as a biological trait’
Wrangham, R., & Conklin-Brittain, N. (2003) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(03)00020-5 · Cited by 294
Hoover, R., & Zhou, Y. (2003) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/s0144-8617(03)00180-2 · Cited by 260
Yadav, B. S., Sharma, A., & Yadav, R. B. (2009) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480902970975 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Bravo, L., Siddhuraju, P., & Saura-Calixto, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-10-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4667-4674
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2089688343
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
