The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antioxidative Ability of Lactic Acid Bacteria
Abstract
Nineteen strains of lactic acid bacteria were investigated for antioxidative activity. These includedLactobacillus acidophilus B, E, N1, 4356, LA-1, and Farr; Lactobacillus bulgaricus 12 278, 448, 449, Lb, 1006, and 11 842; Streptococcus thermophilus 821, MC, 573, 3641, and 19 987; and Bifidobacterium longum B6 and 15 708. Intracellular cell-free extract of all strains demonstrated antioxidative activity with inhibition rates of ascorbate autoxidation in the range of 7-12%. Antioxidative mechanisms including metal ion chelating ability, scavenge of reactive oxygen species, enzyme inhibition, and reducing activity of intracellular cell-free extract of lactic acid bacteria were studied. S. thermophilus 821 had the highest metal ion chelating ability for Fe(2+), and B. longum 15 708 showed the highest Cu(2+) chelating ability among the 19 strains tested. All strains demonstrated reactive oxygen species scavenging ability. L. acidophilus E showed the highest hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, and B. longum B6 had the best hydrogen peroxide scavenging ability. Reducing activity was also found in all strains. Most of the strains tested demonstrated excellent reducing activity. B. longum B6 showed the highest reducing activity among the 19 strains tested. In enzyme inhibition, superoxide dismutase activity was not found in these 19 strains, and the activity of superoxide dismutase was not induced when metal ion Mn(2+), Fe(2+), or Cu(2+)Zn(2+) was present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Probiotic yogurt improves antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients
Ejtahed, H. S., Mohtadi-Nia, J., Homayouni-Rad, A., Niafar, M., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., & Mofid, V. (2012) · Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.013 · Cited by 683
Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria
van de Guchte, M., Serror, P., Chervaux, C., Smokvina, T., Ehrlich, S. D., & Maguin, E. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020631532202 · Cited by 648
Ni, Y., Yang, X., Zheng, L., Wang, Z., Wu, L., Jiang, J., Yang, T., Ma, L., & Fu, Z. (2019) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201900603 · Cited by 255
Antimutagenic and antioxidant properties of milk-kefir and soymilk-kefir
Liu, J.-R., Chen, M.-J., & Lin, C.-W. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf048934k · Cited by 217
Presti, I., D’Orazio, G., Labra, M., La Ferla, B., Mezzasalma, V., Bizzaro, G., Giardina, S., Michelotti, A., Tursi, F., Vassallo, M., et al. (2015) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-015-6482-8 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, M.-Y., & Yen, C.-L.
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-03-23
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1460-1466
- ISSN
- 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5118
- OpenAlex
- W2058200139
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antioxidative Ability of Lactic Acid Bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jf981149l
- The paper
- Lin, M.-Y., & Yen, C.-L. (1999). Antioxidative Ability of Lactic Acid Bacteria. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf981149l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.