The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unveiling the Full Potential of Flexible Receptor Docking Using Multiple Crystallographic Structures
Abstract
One of the current challenges in docking studies is the inclusion of receptor flexibility. This is crucial because the binding sites of many therapeutic targets sample a wide range of conformational states, which has major consequences on molecular recognition. In this paper, we make use of very large sets of X-ray structures of cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) to assess the performance of flexible receptor docking in binding-mode prediction and virtual screening experiments. Flexible receptor docking performs much better than rigid receptor docking in the former application. Regarding the latter, we observe a significant improvement in the prediction of binding affinities, but owing to an increase in the number of false positives, this is not translated into better hit rates. A simple scoring scheme to correct this limitation is presented. More importantly, pitfalls inherent to flexible receptor docking have been identified and guidelines are presented to avoid them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kollman, P. A., Massova, I., Reyes, C., Kuhn, B., Huo, S., Chong, L., Lee, M., Lee, T., Duan, Y., Wang, W., et al. (2000) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar000033j · Cited by 4,978
Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery
Teague, S. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1129 · Cited by 755
Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. J., Murcko, M. A., & Walters, W. P. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990352k · Cited by 698
McGovern, S. L., & Shoichet, B. K. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0300330 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative
Totrov, M., & Abagyan, R. (2008) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.01.004 · Cited by 497
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21214 · Cited by 401
Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery
Feixas, F., Lindert, S., Sinko, W., & McCammon, J. A. (2014) · Biophysical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bpc.2013.10.007 · Cited by 156
Fischer, M., Coleman, R. G., Fraser, J. S., & Shoichet, B. K. (2014) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1954 · Cited by 149
Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design.
Antunes, D. A., Devaurs, D., & Kavraki, L. E. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2015.1094458 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Barril, X., & Morley, S. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-05-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4432-4443
- ISSN
- 0022-2623 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2084485490
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unveiling the Full Potential of Flexible Receptor Docking Using Multiple Crystallographic Structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jm048972v
- The paper
- Barril, X., & Morley, S. D. (2005). Unveiling the Full Potential of Flexible Receptor Docking Using Multiple Crystallographic Structures. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm048972v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.