The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron-Transfer Reaction of Cinnamic Acids and Their Methyl Esters with the DPPH• Radical in Alcoholic Solutions
Abstract
The kinetic behavior of cinnamic acids, their methyl esters, and two catechols 1-10 (ArOH) in the reaction with DPPH(*) in methanol and ethanol is not compatible with a reaction mechanism that involves hydrogen atom abstraction from the hydroxyl group of 1-10 by DPPH(*). The rate of this reaction at 25 degrees C is, in fact, comparatively fast despite that the phenolic OH group of ArOH is hydrogen bonded to solvent molecules. The observed rate constants (k(1)) relative to DPPH(*) + ArOH are 3-5 times larger for the methyl esters than for the corresponding free acids and, for the latter, decrease as their concentration is increased according to the relation k(1) = B/[ArOH](0)(m), where k(1) is given in units of M(-1) s(-1), m is ca. 0.5, and B ranges from 0.02 (p-coumaric acid) to ca. 3.48 (caffeic acid) in methanol and from 0.04 (p-coumaric acid) to ca. 13 (sinapic acid) in ethanol. Apparently, the reaction mechanism of DPPH(*) + ArOH involves a fast electron-transfer process from the phenoxide anion of 1-10 to DPPH(*). Kinetic analysis of the reaction sequence for the free acids leads to an expression for the observed rate constant, k(1), proportional to [ArOH](0)(-1/2) in excellent agreement with the experimental behavior of these phenols. The experimental results are also interpreted in terms of the influence that adventitious acids or bases present in the solvent may have. These impurities dramatically influence the ionization equilibrium of phenols and cause a reduction or an enhancement, respectively, of the measured rate constants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Chemistry behind Antioxidant Capacity Assays
Huang, D., Ou, B., & Prior, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030723c · Cited by 6,162
Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview
Gulcin, İ. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02689-3 · Cited by 2,205
Antioxidant properties of phenols
Foti, M. C. (2007) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1211/jpp.59.12.0010 · Cited by 382
Self-citationAntioxidant Activities and Polyphenolic Contents of Three Selected Micromeria Species from Croatia
Vladimir-Knežević, S., Blažeković, B., Bival Štefan, M., Alegro, A., Kőszegi, T., & Petrik, J. (2011) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules16021454 · Cited by 161
Ebrahimabadi, A. H., Mazoochi, A., Kashi, F. J., Djafari-Bidgoli, Z., & Batooli, H. (2010) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.03.003 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Foti, M. C., Daquino, C., & Geraci, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-02-27
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2309-2314
- ISSN
- 0022-3263 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6904
- OpenAlex
- W2075160628
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron-Transfer Reaction of Cinnamic Acids and Their Methyl Esters with the DPPH• Radical in Alcoholic Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jo035758q
- The paper
- Foti, M. C., Daquino, C., & Geraci, C. (2004). Electron-Transfer Reaction of Cinnamic Acids and Their Methyl Esters with the DPPH• Radical in Alcoholic Solutions. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo035758q
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.