Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 592

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A QM/MM Implementation of the Self-Consistent Charge Density Functional Tight Binding (SCC-DFTB) Method

Cui, Qiang, Elstner, Marcus, Kaxiras, Efthimios, Frauenheim, Thomas, Karplus, Martin·2001·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
DOI 10.1021/jp0029109
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach based on an approximate density functional theory, the so-called self-consistent charge density functional tight binding (SCC-DFTB) method, has been implemented in the CHARMM program and tested on a number of systems of biological interest. In the gas phase, SCC-DFTB gives reliable energetics for models of the triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) catalyzed reactions. The rms errors in the energetics compared to B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) are about 2−4 kcal/mol; this is to be contrasted with AM1, where the corresponding errors are 9−11 kcal/mol. The method also gives accurate vibrational frequencies. For the TIM reactions in the presence of the enzyme, the overall SCC-DFTB/CHARMM results are in somewhat worse agreement with the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)/CHARMM values; the rms error in the energies is 5.4 kcal/mol. Single-point B3LYP/CHARMM energies at the SCC-DFTB/CHARMM optimized structures were found to be very similar to the full B3LYP/CHARMM values. The relative stabilities of the α R and 3 10 conformations of penta- and octaalanine peptides were studied with minimization and molecular dynamics simulations in vacuum and in solution. Although CHARMM and SCC-DFTB give qualitative different results in the gas phase (the latter is in approximate agreement with previous B3LYP calculations), similar behavior was found in aqueous solution simulations with CHARMM and SCC-DFTB/CHARMM. The 3 10 conformation was not found to be stable, and converted to the α R form in about 15 ps. The α R conformation was stable in the simulation with both SCC-DFTB/CHARMM and CHARMM. The i,i+ 3 CO···HN distances in the α R conformation were shorter with the SCC-DFTB method (2.58 Å) than with CHARMM (3.13 Å). With SCC-DFTB/CHARMM, significant populations with i,i+ 3 CO···HN distances near 2.25 Å, particularly for the residues at the termini, were found. This can be related to the conclusion from NMR spectroscopy that the 3 10 configuration contributes for alanine-rich peptides, especially at the termini.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0029109

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. York D. M., 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 5011, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5011 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5011
  2. Matsubara T., 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 2573, 10.1021/jp951762x · doi:10.1021/jp951762x
  3. Gao J., 1996, New York, 7, 119
  4. Sighn U. C., 1996, J. Comput. Chem., 7, 718
  5. Bash P. A., 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 93, 3698, 10.1073/pnas.93.8.3698 · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.8.3698
  6. Gao J., 1994, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 116, 9324, 10.1021/ja00099a059 · doi:10.1021/ja00099a059
  7. Bohr H. G., 1999, Chem. Phys., 246, 13, 10.1016/S0301-0104(99)00176-7 · doi:10.1016/s0301-0104(99)00176-7
  8. Cui Q., J. Am. Chem. Soc. Submitted for publication.
  9. 1997, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
  10. Pariser R., 1956, J. Chem. Phys., 24, 250, 10.1063/1.1742461 · doi:10.1063/1.1742461
  11. Field M. J., 1990, J. Comput. Chem., 11, 700, 10.1002/jcc.540110605 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Eurenius K. P., 1996, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 60, 1189, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)60:6<1189::AID-QUA7>3.0.CO;2-W · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1996)60:6<1189::aid-qua7>3.0.co;2-w
  13. Voet D., 1995, Biochemistry
  14. Sung S. S., 1995, Biophysics, 68, 826
  15. Smythe M. L., 1995, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 10555, 10.1021/ja00147a018 · doi:10.1021/ja00147a018
  16. Hanson P., 1996, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 271, 10.1021/ja952423k · doi:10.1021/ja952423k
  17. Hanson P., 1996, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 7618, 10.1021/ja961025u · doi:10.1021/ja961025u
  18. Long H. W., 1998, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 7039, 10.1021/ja974277j · doi:10.1021/ja974277j
  19. Smythe M. L., 1993, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 11594, 10.1021/ja00077a067 · doi:10.1021/ja00077a067
  20. Alemän C., 1997, Proteins, 28, 83, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199705)28:1<83::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-K · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199705)28:1<83::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-k
  21. Guo H., 1994, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 7104, 10.1021/j100080a002 · doi:10.1021/j100080a002
  22. Proteins, 1986, Wiley & Sons
  23. Liu H., 1992, J. Magn. Reson., 98, 163
  24. Soman K. V., 1993, Biopolymers, 33, 1567, 10.1002/bip.360331007 · doi:10.1002/bip.360331007

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cui, Q., Elstner, M., Kaxiras, E., Frauenheim, T., & Karplus, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2000-12-16
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
569-585
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
DOI
10.1021/jp0029109
OpenAlex
W1983493485
Cited by
592
References
58
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.