Cited by 346DNA Repair MechanismsEnzyme Structure and FunctionDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Structure of a repair enzyme interrogating undamaged DNA elucidates recognition of damaged DNA

Banerjee, Anirban, Yang, Wei, Karplus, Martin, Verdine, Gregory L.·2005·Nature

Abstract

How DNA repair proteins distinguish between the rare sites of damage and the vast expanse of normal DNA is poorly understood. Recognizing the mutagenic lesion 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) represents an especially formidable challenge, because this oxidized nucleobase differs by only two atoms from its normal counterpart, guanine (G). Here we report the use of a covalent trapping strategy to capture a human oxoG repair protein, 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase I (hOGG1), in the act of interrogating normal DNA. The X-ray structure of the trapped complex features a target G nucleobase extruded from the DNA helix but denied insertion into the lesion recognition pocket of the enzyme. Free energy difference calculations show that both attractive and repulsive interactions have an important role in the preferential binding of oxoG compared with G to the active site. The structure reveals a remarkably effective gate-keeping strategy for lesion discrimination and suggests a mechanism for oxoG insertion into the hOGG1 active site.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature03458

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banerjee, A., Yang, W., Karplus, M., & Verdine, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Institut de Science et d'Ingénierie Supramoléculaires (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Karplus, Martin
  • Verdine, Gregory L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2005-03
Volume
434
Issue
7033
Pages
612-618
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2077615862
Cited by
346
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA100742)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM044853)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
OGG1, 8-oxoguanine, oxidative DNA damage, DNA repair, lesion recognition, X-ray crystal structure, free energy difference
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Disulfides, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Guanine, Humans, Models, Molecular, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Conformation, Structure-Activity Relationship, Substrate Specificity, Thermodynamics, Reproducibility of Results, Crystallography, X-Ray, DNA Glycosylases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review