Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Real-Time Immunoassay in Physiological Buffer Enabled by Improved Nanoparticle Adhesion

Riboh, Jonathan C., Haes, Amanda J., McFarland, Adam D., Ranjit Yonzon, Chanda, Van Duyne, Richard P.·2003·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

The shift in the extinction maximum, λ max, of the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) spectrum of triangular Ag nanoparticles (∼90 nm wide and 50 nm high) is used to probe the interaction between a surface-confined antigen, biotin (B), and a solution-phase antibody, anti-biotin (AB). Exposure of biotin-functionalized Ag nanotriangles to 7 × 10 -7 M < [AB] < 7 × 10 -6 M caused a ∼38 nm red-shift in the LSPR λ max . The experimental normalized response of the LSPR λ max shift, (Δ R /Δ R max ), versus [AB] was measured over the concentration range 7 × 10 -10 M < [AB] < 7 × 10 -6 M. Comparison of the experimental data with the theoretical normalized response for a 1:1 binding model yielded values for the saturation response, Δ R max = 38.0 nm, the surface-confined thermodynamic binding constant, K a,surf = 4.5 × 10 7 M -1, and the limit of detection (LOD) < 7 × 10 -10 M. The experimental saturation response was interpreted in terms of a closest-packed structural model for the surface B−AB complex in which the long axis of AB, l AB = 15 nm, is oriented horizontally and the short axis, h AB = 4 nm is oriented vertically to the nanoparticle surface. This model yields a quantitative response for the saturation response, Δ R max = 40.6 nm, in good agreement with experiment, Δ R max = 38.0 nm. An atomic force microscopy (AFM) study supports this interpretation. In addition, major improvements in the LSPR nanobiosensor are reported. The LSPR nanobiosensor substrate was changed from glass to mica, and a surfactant, Triton X-100, was used in the nanosphere lithography fabrication procedure. These changes increased the adhesion of the Ag nanotriangles by a factor of 9 as determined by AFM normal force studies. The improved adhesion of Ag nanotriangles now enables the study of the B−AB immunoassay in a physiologically relevant fluid environment as well as in real-time. These results represent important new steps in the development of the LSPR nanosensor for applications in medical diagnostics, biomedical research, and environmental science.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp022130v

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Riboh, J. C., Haes, A. J., McFarland, A. D., Ranjit Yonzon, C., & Van Duyne, R. P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2003-01-29
Volume
107
Issue
8
Pages
1772-1780
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2078325166
Cited by
475
References
2
FWCI
18.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Real-Time Immunoassay in Physiological Buffer Enabled by Improved Nanoparticle Adhesion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp022130v
The paper
Riboh, J. C., Haes, A. J., McFarland, A. D., Ranjit Yonzon, C., & Van Duyne, R. P. (2003). A Nanoscale Optical Biosensor: Real-Time Immunoassay in Physiological Buffer Enabled by Improved Nanoparticle Adhesion. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp022130v

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.