The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Ion Battery Graphite Solid Electrolyte Interphase Revealed by Microscopy and Spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
The surface reactions of electrolytes with the graphitic anode of lithium ion batteries have been investigated. The investigation utilizes two novel techniques, which are enabled by the use of binder-free graphite anodes. The first method, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, allows straightforward analysis of the graphite solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The second method utilizes multi-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of D 2 O extracts from the cycled anodes. The TEM and NMR data are complemented by XPS and FTIR data, which are routinely used for SEI studies. Cells were cycled with LiPF 6 and ethylene carbonate (EC), ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC), and EC/EMC blends. This unique combination of techniques establishes that for EC/LiPF 6 electrolytes, the graphite SEI is ∼50 nm thick after the first full lithiation cycle, and predominantly contains lithium ethylene dicarbonate (LEDC) and LiF. In cells containing EMC/LiPF 6 electrolytes, the graphite SEI is nonuniform, ∼10–20 nm thick, and contains lithium ethyl carbonate (LEC), lithium methyl carbonate (LMC), and LiF. In cells containing EC/EMC/LiPF 6 electrolytes, the graphite SEI is ∼50 nm thick, and predominantly contains LEDC, LMC, and LiF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Xu, K., von Cresce, A., & Lee, U. (2010) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la1009994 · Cited by 640
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
An, S. J., Li, J., Daniel, C., Mohanty, D., Nagpure, S., & Wood, D. L. (2016) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 · Cited by 2,121
Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S., & Qi, Y. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 · Cited by 1,639
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
Michan, A. L., Parimalam, B. S., Leskes, M., Kerber, R. N., Yoon, T., Grey, C. P., & Lucht, B. L. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02282 · Cited by 541
Self-citationIdentifying the components of the solid–electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries
Wang, L., Menakath, A., Han, F., Wang, Y., Zavalij, P. Y., Gaskell, K. J., Borodin, O., Iuga, D., Brown, S. P., Wang, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z · Cited by 514
Electrolyte Oxidation Pathways in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Rinkel, B. L. D., Hall, D. S., Temprano, I., & Grey, C. P. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c06363 · Cited by 455
Green polycarbonates prepared by the copolymerization of CO2 with epoxides
Taherimehr, M., & Pescarmona, P. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.41141 · Cited by 194
Aging behavior and mechanisms of lithium-ion battery under multi-aging path
Liu, J., Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Wang, Z. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138678 · Cited by 87
Ellis, L. D., Buteau, S., Hames, S. G., Thompson, L. M., Hall, D. S., & Dahn, J. R. (2018) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0861802jes · Cited by 69
Carbonate Free Electrolyte for Lithium Ion Batteries Containing γ-Butyrolactone and Methyl Butyrate
Lazar, M. L., & Lucht, B. L. (2015) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0601506jes · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nie, M., Chalasani, D., Abraham, D. P., Chen, Y., Bose, A., & Lucht, B. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-01-14
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1257-1267
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2322892597
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
