Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Approach to Understanding the Electrocatalytic Activity Enhancement by Superexchange Interaction toward OER in Alkaline Media of Ni–Fe LDH

Oliver-Tolentino, Miguel A., Vázquez-Samperio, Juvencio, Manzo-Robledo, Arturo, González-Huerta, Rosa de Guadalupe, Flores-Moreno, Jorge L., Ramírez-Rosales, Daniel, Guzmán-Vargas, Ariel·2014·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

In the present work, the hydrotalcite-like materials known as layered double hydroxides (LDHs) were synthesized. The Ni–Al and Ni–Fe materials with different Ni/Fe ratio were obtained by coprecipitation method at variable pH. The LDH structure was verified by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared, and Raman spectroscopy. No secondary extra phases were observed for any material. The electronic properties were evaluated by UV–vis spectroscopy, while the magnetic ones were followed by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The results suggested that sample H/Ni–Fe2 (Ni/Fe = 2) has a ferrimagnetic behavior as a result of the combined action of Ni II –OH–Ni II, Fe III –OH–Ni II, and Fe III –OH–Fe III pairs across the layers and ferromagnetic interactions operating between layers. Furthermore, the material H/Ni–Fe1 (Ni/Fe = 1.5) showed a combination of paramagnetic and ferromagnetic interactions which favors a superexchange interaction among metal centers through the OH bridges across the cationic sheets; the superexchange interaction enhances the electrocatalytic activity on the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in alkaline media. On the other hand, XPS experiments showed that the H/Ni–Fe1 did not exhibit structural changes after electrochemical processes. The activity toward the OER was in the order H/Ni–Fe1 > H/Ni–Fe2 > H/Ni–Al, as was confirmed using in situ linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) coupled with mass spectrometry (differential electrochemical mass spectrometry).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp506946b

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Oliver-Tolentino, M. A., Vázquez-Samperio, J., Manzo-Robledo, A., González-Huerta, R. D. G., Flores-Moreno, J. L., Ramírez-Rosales, D., & Guzmán-Vargas, A.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2014-09-19
Volume
118
Issue
39
Pages
22432-22438
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2078995981
Cited by
245
References
3
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.