Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 708

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Size Evaluation of Gold Nanoparticles by UV−vis Spectroscopy

Amendola, Vincenzo, Meneghetti, Moreno·2009·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

We present a method for the evaluation of the average size of gold nanoparticles based on the fitting of their UV−vis spectra by the Mie model for spheres. The method gives good results using a calibration of the dumping frequency of the surface plasmon resonance and accounting for the presence of nonspherical AuNP in solution by the Gans model for spheroids. It has been successfully applied to free and functionalized gold nanoparticles in various solvents with diameters in the 4−25 nm range. Despite the differences among samples, we found an accuracy of about 6% on the nanoparticles average size with respect to sizes measured by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Moreover, the fitting model provides other information not available from TEM like the concentration of AuNP in the sample and the fraction of nonspherical nanoparticles, which is particularly useful for measuring aggregation processes. The fitting procedure and models are thoroughly discussed in the text, and the fitting programs are freely accessible on the web.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp8082425

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 708

Metadata

Authors
Amendola, V., & Meneghetti, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2009-02-24
Volume
113
Issue
11
Pages
4277-4285
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2007995620
Cited by
708
References
3
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.