The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Assessment of Theoretical Methods for Nonbonded Interactions: Comparison to Complete Basis Set Limit Coupled-Cluster Potential Energy Curves for the Benzene Dimer, the Methane Dimer, Benzene−Methane, and Benzene−H2S
Abstract
Large, correlation-consistent basis sets have been used to very closely approximate the coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] complete basis set potential energy curves of several prototype nonbonded complexes, the sandwich, T-shaped, and parallel-displaced benzene dimers, the methane-benzene complex, the H2S-benzene complex, and the methane dimer. These benchmark potential energy curves are used to assess the performance of several methods for nonbonded interactions, including various spin-component-scaled second-order perturbation theory (SCS-MP2) methods, the spin-component-scaled coupled-cluster singles and doubles method (SCS-CCSD), density functional theory empirically corrected for dispersion (DFT-D), and the meta-generalized-gradient approximation functionals M05-2X and M06-2X. These approaches generally provide good results for the test set, with the SCS methods being somewhat more robust. M05-2X underbinds for the test cases considered, while the performances of DFT-D and M06-2X are similar. Density fitting, dual basis, and local correlation approximations all introduce only small errors in the interaction energies but can speed up the computations significantly, particulary when used in combination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PSI3: An open‐source Ab Initio electronic structure package
Crawford, T. D., Sherrill, C. D., Valeev, E. F., Fermann, J. T., King, R. A., Leininger, M. L., Brown, S. T., Janssen, C. L., Seidl, E. T., Kenny, J. P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20573 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Cited by
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Hong, Y., Lam, J. W. Y., & Tang, B. Z. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15113d · Cited by 6,363
Density functional theory with London dispersion corrections
Grimme, S. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.30 · Cited by 2,829
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition: Energetics and Structures
Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M., & Diederich, F. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201007560 · Cited by 1,539
Nonlocal van der Waals density functional: The simpler the better
Vydrov, O. A., & Van Voorhis, T. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3521275 · Cited by 1,312
S66: A Well-balanced Database of Benchmark Interaction Energies Relevant to Biomolecular Structures
Řezáč, J., Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct2002946 · Cited by 1,019
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Local Nature of Substituent Effects in Stacking Interactions
Wheeler, S. E. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202932e · Cited by 466
Thanthiriwatte, K. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Burns, L. A., & Sherrill, C. D. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct100469b · Cited by 462
Self-citationBenchmark Calculations of Interaction Energies in Noncovalent Complexes and Their Applications
Řezáč, J., & Hobza, P. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00526 · Cited by 455
Kozuch, S., Gruzman, D., & Martin, J. M. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1070852 · Cited by 398
Density fitting of intramonomer correlation effects in symmetry-adapted perturbation theory
Hohenstein, E. G., & Sherrill, C. D. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3451077 · Cited by 296
Self-citationNoncovalent interactions in biochemistry
Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.8 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Sherrill, C. D., Takatani, T., & Hohenstein, E. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-08-18
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 10146-10159
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1983729784
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
