The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Performance of Ab Initio and Density Functional Methods for Conformational Equilibria of CnH2 n+2 Alkane Isomers (n = 4−8)
Open accessAbstract
Conformational energies of n-butane, n-pentane, and n-hexane have been calculated at the CCSD(T) level and at or near the basis set limit. Post-CCSD(T) contributions were considered and found to be unimportant. The data thus obtained were used to assess the performance of a variety of density functional methods. Double-hybrid functionals like B2GP-PLYP and B2K-PLYP, especially with a small Grimme-type empirical dispersion correction, are capable of rendering conformational energies of CCSD(T) quality. These were used as a "secondary standard" for a larger sample of alkanes, including isopentane and the branched hexanes as well as key isomers of heptane and octane. Popular DFT functionals like B3LYP, B3PW91, BLYP, PBE, and PBE0 tend to overestimate conformer energies without dispersion correction, while the M06 family severely underestimates GG interaction energies. Grimme-type dispersion corrections for these overcorrect and lead to qualitatively wrong conformer orderings. All of these functionals also exhibit deficiencies in the conformer geometries, particularly the backbone torsion angles. The PW6B95 and, to a lesser extent, BMK functionals are relatively free of these deficiencies. Performance of these methods is further investigated to derive conformer ensemble corrections to the enthalpy function, H(298) - H(0), and the Gibbs energy function, gef(T) identical with -[G(T) - H(0)]/T, of these alkanes. These are essential for accurate computed heats of formation of especially the larger species as the corrections for these are several times the expected uncertainty in modern computational thermochemistry methods such as W4 theory. While H(298) - H(0) is only moderately sensitive to the level of theory, gef(T) exhibits more pronounced sensitivity. Once again, double hybrids acquit themselves very well. The effects of zero-point energy and nonfactorizable rovibrational partition functions have been considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Najibi, A., & Goerigk, L. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00842 · Cited by 320
Brauer, B., Kesharwani, M. K., Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c6cp00688d · Cited by 238
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gruzman, D., Karton, A., & Martin, J. M. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 11974-11983
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1979534713
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of Ab Initio and Density Functional Methods for Conformational Equilibria of CnH2 n+2 Alkane Isomers (n = 4−8). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp903640h
- The paper
- Gruzman, D., Karton, A., & Martin, J. M. L. (2009). Performance of Ab Initio and Density Functional Methods for Conformational Equilibria of CnH2 n+2 Alkane Isomers (n = 4−8). The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp903640h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.