The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the Photoelectronic and Photocatalytic Activities of Various Anatase and Rutile Forms of Titania in Pure Liquid Organic Phases and in Aqueous Solutions
Abstract
Various titania samples of industrial origin (Degussa and Tioxide) have been characterized by electrical photoconductance measurements and tested as photocatalysts in various liquid media (either pure organic liquids or aqueous solutions) as a function of their structure (anatase versus rutile). Anatase was constantly found more active than rutile, whatever the reaction chosen (mild oxidation of pure cyclohexane and 2-propanol; total degradation of phenol and nitrophenol isomers in water). In identical conditions, Degussa was found more active, but the intrinsic activity, expressed in moles converted per hour and per square meter of active surface, was found slightly higher for anatase Tioxide. The higher activity of anatase with respect to that of rutile could be explained by the interpretation of the photoconductance measurements, which evidence the higher aptitude of anatase (i) to photoadsorb oxygen, in O 2 - and O - forms; (ii) to photodesorb it; and (iii) to have a lower relative electron−hole recombination rate. The origin of the differences in the photocatalytic behavior of titania leading to mild oxidation in pure liquid organic phase and total oxidative degradation in aqueous medium is also analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications
Pelaez, M., Nolan, N. T., Pillai, S. C., Seery, M. K., Falaras, P., Kontos, A. G., Dunlop, P. S. M., Hamilton, J. W. J., Byrne, J. A., O'Shea, K., et al. (2012) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036 · Cited by 4,047
Review of the anatase to rutile phase transformation
Hanaor, D. A. H., & Sorrell, C. C. (2011) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 · Cited by 3,394
Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., & Thurnauer, M. C. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0273934 · Cited by 2,015
Recent advances in photocatalysis for environmental applications
Byrne, C., Subramanian, G., & Pillai, S. C. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.080 · Cited by 820
Photocatalysts with internal electric fields
Li, L., Salvador, P. A., & Rohrer, G. S. (2014) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c3nr03998f · Cited by 774
Metadata
- Authors
- Sclafani, A., & Herrmann, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 13655-13661
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W2080248473
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the Photoelectronic and Photocatalytic Activities of Various Anatase and Rutile Forms of Titania in Pure Liquid Organic Phases and in Aqueous Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp9533584
- The paper
- Sclafani, A., & Herrmann, J. M. (1996). Comparison of the Photoelectronic and Photocatalytic Activities of Various Anatase and Rutile Forms of Titania in Pure Liquid Organic Phases and in Aqueous Solutions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9533584
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.