The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative in vitro Evaluation of Several Colloidal Systems, Nanoparticles, Nanocapsules, and Nanoemulsions, as Ocular Drug Carriers
Abstract
Three different colloidal carriers, namely, nanoparticles and nanocapsules made of poly-epsilon-caprolactone and submicron emulsions, were designed, and their capacity for increasing the comeal penetration of drugs was investigated. The three systems differed in their inner structure and composition, but they had a similar size (200-250 nm) and a negative superficial charge (-16 to -42 mV). Indomethacin, which was used as a model drug, was dispersed at a molecular level within the colloidal systems, no chemical interaction between the polymer and the drug being detected. Release of the encapsulated indomethacin occurred very rapidly upon high dilution in a buffered medium and was independent of the composition of the system. The in vitro comeal penetration of the encapsulated indomethacin was more than 3-fold that of the commercial eye drops. This increased penetration was similar for the three formulations investigated, which therefore excludes the influence of the inner structure or chemical composition of the colloidal systems on the comeal penetration of indomethacin. Thus, it could be stated that the main factor responsible for the favorable comeal transport of indomethacin is the colloidal nature of these carriers rather than their inner structure or composition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century
Woodruff, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 · Cited by 4,033
Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices
Soppimath, K. S., Aminabhavi, T. M., Kulkarni, A. R., & Rudzinski, W. E. (2001) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/s0168-3659(00)00339-4 · Cited by 3,549
Ophthalmic drug delivery systems—Recent advances
Le Bourlais, C., Acar, L., Zia, H., Sado, P. A., Needham, T., & Leverge, R. (1998) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/s1350-9462(97)00002-5 · Cited by 698
Ocular drug delivery: present innovations and future challenges
Gote, V., Sikder, S., Sicotte, J., & Pal, D. (2019) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.119.256933 · Cited by 441
A Review of In Vitro Drug Release Test Methods for Nano-Sized Dosage Forms
D’Souza, S. (2014) · Advances in Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1155/2014/304757 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Calvo, P., Vila-Jato, J. L., & Alonso, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 530-536
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117652097
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative in vitro Evaluation of Several Colloidal Systems, Nanoparticles, Nanocapsules, and Nanoemulsions, as Ocular Drug Carriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/js950474+
- The paper
- Calvo, P., Vila-Jato, J. L., & Alonso, M. J. (1996). Comparative in vitro Evaluation of Several Colloidal Systems, Nanoparticles, Nanocapsules, and Nanoemulsions, as Ocular Drug Carriers. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1021/js950474%2B
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.