The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Application of Binary Polymer System in Drug Release Rate Modulation. 2. Influence of Formulation Variables and Hydrodynamic Conditions on Release Kinetics
Abstract
The significance of factors such as drug solubility, polymer molecular weight, drug loading dose, compression force, and hydrodynamic conditions on drug release from a swellable hydrophilic delivery system was investigated. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and pectin were major polymeric constituents of the delivery system. Nifedipine, prednisolone, theophylline anhydrous, and diltiazem hydrochloride with solubilities of < 0.001%, <0.1%, <1%, and >50%, respectively, were used as drug models. Results show that changes in pectin:HPMC ratios, HPMC molecular weight, and hydrodynamic conditions exert notable influences on release rate and release duration from the designed system. In the case of prednisolone, drug loading up to 30% (w/w) of the matrix composition (pectin:HPMC K4M; 3:6) had no effect on zero-order release kinetics, and the delivery system was insensitive to changes in compression force (2000 to 5000 lb). For nifedipine, theophylline, and diltiazem, determination of mean dissolution time (MDT) for 50 and 80% drug release provided accurate information on release behavior. The dominating effect of matrix composition over variations in drug solubilities in controlling drug release from the delivery system was evident from similarities in dissolution profiles. It is further shown that hydrodynamic stress and intensity of fluid flow causes greater attrition at the swollen periphery and is responsible for dramatic increases in release rates. This latter observation confirms that the mechanism of drug release from this swellable system is erosion dependent. Influence of polymer molecular weight and drug solubility on release kinetics and the potential of the delivery system is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles
Costa, P., & Sousa Lobo, J. M. (2001) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(01)00095-1 · Cited by 5,509
Kamaly, N., Yameen, B., Wu, J., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00346 · Cited by 3,070
Polymers for Drug Delivery Systems
Liechty, W. B., Kryscio, D. R., Slaughter, B. V., & Peppas, N. A. (2010) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100847 · Cited by 1,608
Arifin, D. Y., Lee, L. Y., & Wang, C.-H. (2006) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.007 · Cited by 674
Pectin-based systems for colon-specific drug delivery via oral route
Liu, L., Fishman, M. L., Kost, J., & Hicks, K. B. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00213-8 · Cited by 553
Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review
Ambekar, R. S., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2019) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, H., & Fassihi, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 323-328
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049883735
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.