Cited by 5,509Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsAnalytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals

Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles

Costa, Paulo, Sousa Lobo, José Manuel·2001·European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Over recent years, drug release/dissolution from solid pharmaceutical dosage forms has been the subject of intense and profitable scientific developments. Whenever a new solid dosage form is developed or produced, it is necessary to ensure that drug dissolution occurs in an appropriate manner. The pharmaceutical industry and the registration authorities do focus, nowadays, on drug dissolution studies. The quantitative analysis of the values obtained in dissolution/release tests is easier when mathematical formulas that express the dissolution results as a function of some of the dosage forms characteristics are used. In some cases, these mathematic models are derived from the theoretical analysis of the occurring process. In most of the cases the theoretical concept does not exist and some empirical equations have proved to be more appropriate. Drug dissolution from solid dosage forms has been described by kinetic models in which the dissolved amount of drug (Q) is a function of the test time, t or Q=f(t). Some analytical definitions of the Q(t) function are commonly used, such as zero order, first order, Hixson-Crowell, Weibull, Higuchi, Baker-Lonsdale, Korsmeyer-Peppas and Hopfenberg models. Other release parameters, such as dissolution time (tx%), assay time (tx min), dissolution efficacy (ED), difference factor (f1), similarity factor (f2) and Rescigno index (xi1 and xi2) can be used to characterize drug dissolution/release profiles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0928-0987(01)00095-1

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, P., & Sousa Lobo, J. M.
Affiliations
Universidade do Porto (PT)
Corresponding author
Costa, Paulo
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
123-133
ISSN
0928-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115439624
Cited by
5,509
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 295 · 2025: 278 · 2024: 269 · 2023: 287 · 2022: 299 · 2021: 367 · 2020: 390 · 2019: 335 · 2018: 350 · 2017: 401 · 2016: 324 · 2015: 334 · 2014: 326 · 2013: 273 · 2012: 234
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
Keywords
drug dissolution, dissolution profile, dissolution kinetics, zero-order release, first-order release, Higuchi model, Korsmeyer-Peppas model, Weibull model, Hixson-Crowell model, similarity factor f2, solid dosage forms, drug release
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Drug Industry, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Pharmacokinetics, Solubility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review