The DOI matches its Crossref record; 267 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review
Abstract
Abstract Chronic wound healing is an intricate time-consuming process (healing time ∼12 weeks), susceptible to external biological attack such as bacteria (e.g. E. coli, B. subtilis, S. aureus etc.) promoting wound infection and exhibit a negative effect on the immune system, therefore, it is a necessity to form a controlled environment for wound healing with the help of suitable barrier. Over the past few decades, various topical formulations of wound barriers like films, hydrogels, emulsions and nano/micro-fibers have been explored. The drug-embedded fibers are the potential candidate for wound healing as a barrier owing to the large specific surface area (for surface functionalization), enormous porosity ∼60–90% (for oxy-permeability), reticulated nano-porosity (for inhibition of the microorganism) and advanced electrospinning methodology which facilitates sustained drug release. Wound bed exhibits 37 °C temperature and 7.4 pH (typically for blood) condition which triggers the drug release and nano/micro-fiber degradation simultaneously. Drug-embedded nano/micro-fiber consists of a matrix with excellent biocompatibility, appreciable biodegradation rate (e.g. Chitin nanofiber-20% degradation in 15 days) and a drug with a superior antibiotic, antimicrobial property, besides certain drug (e.g. Captopril) also promote vasodilation which increases in-vascular permeability leading to rapid movement of leukocytes into the affected tissue, thereby reducing the healing time. In this review article, we discuss the consolidated recent advanced works on wound healing and wound dressing which implies the significance of wound dressing. In addition, the recent advancements in nano/micro-fiber fabrication methodology for drug release mechanism, and benefits of the fiber-based wound dressings compared to conventional wound dressings have been extensively discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Sudheesh Kumar, P. T., Lakshmanan, V.-K., Anilkumar, T. V., Ramya, C., Reshmi, P., Unnikrishnan, A. G., Nair, S. V., & Jayakumar, R. (2012) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am300292v · Cited by 752
RetractedMechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers
Korsmeyer, R. W., Gurny, R., Doelker, E., Buri, P., & Peppas, N. A. (1983) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/0378-5173(83)90064-9 · Cited by 5,258
Wound Healing--Aiming for Perfect Skin Regeneration
Martin, P. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.75 · Cited by 4,804
Ritger, P. L., & Peppas, N. A. (1987) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/0168-3659(87)90034-4 · Cited by 3,830
Wound Healing Dressings and Drug Delivery Systems: A Review
Boateng, J. S., Matthews, K. H., Stevens, H. N. E., & Eccleston, G. M. (2008) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.21210 · Cited by 3,049
Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome
Grice, E. A., Kong, H. H., Conlan, S., Deming, C. B., Davis, J., Young, A. C., Program, N. C. S., Bouffard, G. G., Blakesley, R. W., Murray, P. R., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171700 · Cited by 2,953
Inflammation in Wound Repair: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms
Eming, S. A., Krieg, T., & Davidson, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700701 · Cited by 2,429
WINTER, G. D. (1962) · Nature · doi:10.1038/193293a0 · Cited by 2,253
Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health
Glaser, R., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (2005) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1571 · Cited by 2,190
Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers.
Peppas, N. A. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 2,139
Cited by
A review of current advancements for wound healing: Biomaterial applications and medical devices
Deng, X., Gould, M., & Ali, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35086 · Cited by 355
Nanocellulose based biodegradable polymers
Zinge, C., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2020) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109758 · Cited by 322
Self-citationElectrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review
Liu, X., Xu, H., Zhang, M., & Yu, D.-G. (2021) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes11100770 · Cited by 311
Advancements in MXene-Polymer composites for various biomedical applications
George, S. M., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2020) · Ceramics International · doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.12.257 · Cited by 265
Self-citationRecent Progress of Highly Adhesive Hydrogels as Wound Dressings
Zhang, L., Liu, M., Zhang, Y., & Pei, R. (2020) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01069 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Ambekar, R. S., & Kandasubramanian, B.
- Venue
- European Polymer Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 304-336
- ISSN
- 0014-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945853742
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 267
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020
- The paper
- Ambekar, R. S., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2019). Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review. European Polymer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.