Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 267 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review

Ambekar, Rushikesh S., Kandasubramanian, Balasubramanian·2019·European Polymer Journal

Abstract

Abstract Chronic wound healing is an intricate time-consuming process (healing time ∼12 weeks), susceptible to external biological attack such as bacteria (e.g. E. coli, B. subtilis, S. aureus etc.) promoting wound infection and exhibit a negative effect on the immune system, therefore, it is a necessity to form a controlled environment for wound healing with the help of suitable barrier. Over the past few decades, various topical formulations of wound barriers like films, hydrogels, emulsions and nano/micro-fibers have been explored. The drug-embedded fibers are the potential candidate for wound healing as a barrier owing to the large specific surface area (for surface functionalization), enormous porosity ∼60–90% (for oxy-permeability), reticulated nano-porosity (for inhibition of the microorganism) and advanced electrospinning methodology which facilitates sustained drug release. Wound bed exhibits 37 °C temperature and 7.4 pH (typically for blood) condition which triggers the drug release and nano/micro-fiber degradation simultaneously. Drug-embedded nano/micro-fiber consists of a matrix with excellent biocompatibility, appreciable biodegradation rate (e.g. Chitin nanofiber-20% degradation in 15 days) and a drug with a superior antibiotic, antimicrobial property, besides certain drug (e.g. Captopril) also promote vasodilation which increases in-vascular permeability leading to rapid movement of leukocytes into the affected tissue, thereby reducing the healing time. In this review article, we discuss the consolidated recent advanced works on wound healing and wound dressing which implies the significance of wound dressing. In addition, the recent advancements in nano/micro-fiber fabrication methodology for drug release mechanism, and benefits of the fiber-based wound dressings compared to conventional wound dressings have been extensively discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020

Cites

267 of 267 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 267 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Ambekar, R. S., & Kandasubramanian, B.
Venue
European Polymer Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
117
Pages
304-336
ISSN
0014-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945853742
Cited by
447
References
267
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020
The paper
Ambekar, R. S., & Kandasubramanian, B. (2019). Advancements in nanofibers for wound dressing: A review. European Polymer Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.