The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) Cells: A Tool for Membrane Permeability Screening
Abstract
The goal of this work was to investigate the use of MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells as a possible tool for assessing the membrane permeability properties of early drug discovery compounds. Apparent permeability (Papp) values of 55 compounds with known human absorption values were determined using MDCK cell monolayers. For comparison, Papp values of the same compounds were also determined using Caco-2 cells, a well-characterized in vitro model of intestinal drug absorption. Monolayers were grown on 0. 4-microm Transwell-COL membrane culture inserts. MDCK cells were seeded at high density and cultured for 3 days, and Caco-2 cells were cultured under standard conditions for 21 to 25 days. Compounds were tested using 100 microM donor solutions in transport medium (pH 7.4) containing 1% DMSO. The Papp values in MDCK cells correlated well with those in Caco-2 cells (r2 = 0.79). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for MDCK Papp and human absorption was 0.58 compared with 0.54 for Caco-2 Papp and human absorption. These results indicate that MDCK cells may be a useful tool for rapid membrane permeability screening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oral Druggable Space beyond the Rule of 5: Insights from Drugs and Clinical Candidates
Doak, B. C., Over, B., Giordanetto, F., & Kihlberg, J. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013 · Cited by 835
Coexistence of passive and carrier-mediated processes in drug transport
Sugano, K., Kansy, M., Artursson, P., Avdeef, A., Bendels, S., Di, L., Ecker, G. F., Faller, B., Fischer, H., Gerebtzoff, G., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3187 · Cited by 649
Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model
Kuepfer, L., Niederalt, C., Wendl, T., Schlender, J., Willmann, S., Lippert, J., Block, M., Eissing, T., & Teutonico, D. (2016) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12134 · Cited by 425
Improving Oral Bioavailability of Peptides by Multiple N‐Methylation: Somatostatin Analogues
Biron, E., Chatterjee, J., Ovadia, O., Langenegger, D., Brueggen, J., Hoyer, D., Schmid, H. A., Jelinek, R., Gilon, C., Hoffman, A., et al. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200705797 · Cited by 374
Zhu, C., Jiang, L., Chen, T.-M., & Hwang, K.-K. (2002) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0223-5234(02)01360-0 · Cited by 351
Applications of nanotechnology in drug delivery to the central nervous system
Saeedi, M., Eslamifar, M., Khezri, K., & Dizaj, S. M. (2019) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.133 · Cited by 342
Ke, W., Shao, K., Huang, R., Han, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., Kuang, Y., Ye, L., Lou, J., & Jiang, C. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.049 · Cited by 337
Human respiratory epithelial cell culture for drug delivery applications
Forbes, B., & Ehrhardt, C. (2005) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2005.02.010 · Cited by 306
Pharmaceutical profiling in drug discovery
Kerns, E. (2003) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02649-7 · Cited by 288
Inácio, Â. S., Mesquita, K. A., Baptista, M., Ramalho-Santos, J., Vaz, W. L. C., & Vieira, O. V. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019850 · Cited by 141
“[17,21,22,23].”
Salphati, L., Childers, K., Pan, L., Tsutsui, K., & Takahashi, L. (2001) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1211/0022357011776252 · Cited by 132
Self-citationKatt, M. E., Xu, Z. S., Gerecht, S., & Searson, P. C. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152105 · Cited by 129
Katt, M. E., Linville, R. M., Mayo, L. N., Xu, Z. S., & Searson, P. C. (2018) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-018-0092-7 · Cited by 102
(2004) · Cited by 101
Nazer, B., Hong, S., & Selkoe, D. J. (2008) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2007.12.005 · Cited by 90
Maass, C., Stokes, C. L., Griffith, L. G., & Cirit, M. (2017) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c6ib00243a · Cited by 72
(2004) · PubMed · Cited by 66
Scotcher, D., Jones, C., Rostami-Hodjegan, A., & Galetin, A. (2016) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2016.03.018 · Cited by 61
Becherer, J. D., Boros, E. E., Carpenter, T. Y., Cowan, D. J., Deaton, D. N., Haffner, C. D., Jeune, M. R., Kaldor, I. W., Poole, J. C., Preugschat, F., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00992 · Cited by 55
Development of a Dynamic Physiologically Based Mechanistic Kidney Model to Predict Renal Clearance
Huang, W., & Isoherranen, N. (2018) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12321 · Cited by 49
Kimura, H., Nakamura, H., Goto, T., Uchida, W., Uozumi, T., Nishizawa, D., Shinha, K., Sakagami, J., & Doi, K. (2024) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d3lc00934c · Cited by 20
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics
Prabu, S. L., Suriyaprakash, T. N. K., Ruckmani, K., & Thirumurugan, R. (2015) · Basic Pharmacokinetic Concepts and Some Clinical Applications · doi:10.5772/61160 · Cited by 7
Early ADME/T Predictions: Toy or Tool?
Tetko, I. V., & Oprea, T. I. (2008) · Chemoinformatics Approaches to Virtual Screening · doi:10.1039/9781847558879-00240 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Irvine, J. D., Takahashi, L., Lockhart, K., Cheong, J., Tolan, J. W., Selick, H. E., & Grove, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046827775
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
