The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Challenge of Electrolyte Solutions for Li–Air Batteries: Monitoring Oxygen Reduction and Related Reactions in Polyether Solutions by Spectroscopy and EQCM
Abstract
Polyether solvents are considered interesting and important candidates for Li-O2 battery systems. Discharge of Li-O2 battery systems forms Li oxides. Their mechanism of formation is complex. The stability of most relevant polar aprotic solvents toward these Li oxides is questionable. Specially high surface area carbon electrodes were developed for the present work. In this study, several spectroscopic tools and in situ measurements using electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) were employed to explore the discharge-charge processes and related side reactions in Li-O2 battery systems containing electrolyte solutions based on triglyme/lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) electrolyte solutions. The systematic mechanism of lithium oxides formation was monitored. A combination of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), NMR, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) measurements in conjunction with electrochemical studies demonstrated the intrinsic instability and incompatibility of polyether solvents for Li-air batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Xiao J., 2011, Nano Lett., 11, 5071, 10.1021/nl203332e · DOI · Paper page
- Girishkumar G., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 1, 2193, 10.1021/jz1005384 · DOI · Paper page
- Christensen J., 2012, J. Electrochem. Soc., 159, R1, 10.1149/2.086202jes · DOI · Paper page
- Mccloskey B. D., 2011, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 1161, 10.1021/jz200352v · DOI · Paper page
- Garsuch A., 2012, Z. Phys. Chem., 226, 107, 10.1524/zpch.2011.0136 · doi:10.1524/zpch.2011.0136
- Herranz J., 2012, J. Phys. Chem. C., 116, 19084, 10.1021/jp304277z · doi:10.1021/jp304277z
- Peng Z., 2012, Science (New York, N.Y.), 337, 563, 10.1126/science.1223985 · DOI · Paper page
- Peng Z., 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50, 6351, 10.1002/anie.201100879 · DOI · Paper page
- Aurbach M. L., 1991, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 297, 225, 10.1016/0022-0728(91)85370-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Xu W., 2011, J. Power Sources, 196, 9631, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.099 · DOI · Paper page
- Read J., 2006, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, A96, 10.1149/1.2131827 · DOI · Paper page
- Lu Y., 2011, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, 19048, 10.1021/ja208608s · DOI · Paper page
- Aurbach D., 1995, J. Electroanal. Chem., 393, 43, 10.1016/0022-0728(95)04014-F · doi:10.1016/0022-0728(95)04014-f
- Laoire C. O., 2009, J. Phys. Chem. C, 113, 20127, 10.1021/jp908090s · DOI · Paper page
- Laoire C. O., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. C, 114, 9178, 10.1021/jp102019y · DOI · Paper page
- McCloskey B. D., 2011, J. Phys. Chem. C, 133, 18038
- Freunberger S. A., 2011, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50, 8609, 10.1002/anie.201102357 · DOI · Paper page
- Younesi R., 2012, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 18597, 10.1021/jp303691m · DOI
- Jung H.-G., 2012, Nat. Chem., 4, 579, 10.1038/nchem.1376 · DOI · Paper page
- Black R., 2012, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 2902, 10.1021/ja2111543 · DOI · Paper page
- Ren S., 2005, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 16, 333, 10.1016/j.jasms.2004.11.017 · doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2004.11.017
- Ferapontov Y. A., 2009, Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 79, 891, 10.1134/S1070363209050041 · doi:10.1134/s1070363209050041
- Etacheri V., 2012, Langmuir, 28, 6175, 10.1021/la300306v · doi:10.1021/la300306v
- Veith G. M., 2012, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 3, 1242, 10.1021/jz300430s · DOI
- Pedersen C. J., 1967, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 7017, 10.1021/ja01002a035 · DOI · Paper page
- Kornblum N., 1951, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 880, 10.1021/ja01146a542 · doi:10.1021/ja01146a542
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond
Muldoon, J., Bucur, C. B., & Gregory, T. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500049y · Cited by 1,376
Advances in understanding mechanisms underpinning lithium–air batteries
Aurbach, D., McCloskey, B. D., Nazar, L. F., & Bruce, P. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.128 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationCurrent density dependence of peroxide formation in the Li–O2 battery and its effect on charge
Adams, B. D., Radtke, C., Black, R., Trudeau, M. L., Zaghib, K., & Nazar, L. F. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40697k · Cited by 678
From lithium to sodium: Cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries
Adelhelm, P., Hartmann, P., Bender, C. L., Busche, M., Eufinger, C., & Janek, J. (2015) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.105 · Cited by 478
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharon, D., Etacheri, V., Garsuch, A., Afri, M., Frimer, A. A., & Aurbach, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-12-19
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2320745993
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Challenge of Electrolyte Solutions for Li–Air Batteries: Monitoring Oxygen Reduction and Related Reactions in Polyether Solutions by Spectroscopy and EQCM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jz3017842
- The paper
- Sharon, D., Etacheri, V., Garsuch, A., Afri, M., Frimer, A. A., & Aurbach, D. (2013). On the Challenge of Electrolyte Solutions for Li–Air Batteries: Monitoring Oxygen Reduction and Related Reactions in Polyether Solutions by Spectroscopy and EQCM. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3017842
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.