The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alkyl Phosphonate/Phosphate Coating on Magnetite Nanoparticles: A Comparison with Fatty Acids
Abstract
Coated magnetite nanoparticles with a 6−8 nm average diameter were prepared. The surfactants used to stabilize the nanoparticles and disperse them in organic solvents were oleic acid (OA), lauric acid, dodecyl phosphonate, hexadecyl phosphonate, and dihexadecyl phosphate. Transmission electron microscopy analyses of the aggregation of the coated particles suggest that carboxylate surfactants provide the particles with better isolation and dispersibility as compared with phosphonate surfactants. However, Fourier transform infrared spectra of the phosphonate and phosphate coated particles suggest that these surfactants cover the surface of the nanoparticles in islands of high packing density. The thermogravimetric and differential scanning calorimetry measurements suggest that there is a quasi-bilayer of these surfactants covering the surface of the nanoparticles, with varying amounts of surfactant in the outer layer and with the second layer weakly bound to the primary layer through hydrophobic interactions between the alkyl chains. The desorption temperatures of the alkyl phosphonates and phosphate are higher than those of the carboxylate coated particles. The enthalpy of binding of the ligands suggests strong P−O−Fe bonding on the surface. Nevertheless, regardless of binding strength, the OA coated particles are better dispersed in organic solvents. Their higher hydrophobicity is likely due to different interactions among the oleyl chains and/or a smaller tendency to form bilayer structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Monodisperse FePt Nanoparticles and Ferromagnetic FePt Nanocrystal Superlattices
Sun, S., Murray, C. B., Weller, D., Folks, L., & Moser, A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.1989 · Cited by 6,137
Cited by
Laurent, S., Forge, D., Port, M., Roch, A., Robic, C., Vander Elst, L., & Muller, R. N. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068445e · Cited by 6,852
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles
Ali, A., Zafar, H., Zia, M., ul Haq, I., Phull, A. R., Ali, J. S., & Hussain, A. (2016) · Nanotechnology, Science and Applications · doi:10.2147/nsa.s99986 · Cited by 1,591
Oleic acid coating on the monodisperse magnetite nanoparticles
Zhang, L., He, R., & Gu, H.-C. (2006) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.05.023 · Cited by 994
Gupta, A. K., Naregalkar, R. R., Vaidya, V. D., & Gupta, M. (2007) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/17435889.2.1.23 · Cited by 708
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: from preparations to in vivo MRI applications
Qiao, R., Yang, C., & Gao, M. (2009) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b902394a · Cited by 685
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahoo, Y., Pizem, H., Fried, T., Golodnitsky, D., Burstein, L., Sukenik, C. N., & Markovich, G.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-11-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 7907-7911
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2009228997
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.