The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic Multicompartment Device for Neuroscience Research
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes and characterizes a novel microfabricated neuronal culture device. This device combines microfabrication, microfluidic, and surface micropatterning techniques to create a multicompartment neuronal culturing device that can be used in a number of neuroscience research applications. The device is fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane), PDMS, using soft lithography techniques. The PDMS device is placed on a tissue culture dish (polystyrene) or glass substrate, forming two compartments with volumes of less than 2 μL each. These two compartments are separated by a physical barrier in which a number of micron-size grooves are embedded to allow growth of neurites across the compartments while maintaining fluidic isolation. Cells are plated into the somal (cell body) compartment, and after 3-4 days, neurites extend into the neuritic compartment via the grooves. Viability of the neurons in the devices is between 50 and 70% after 7 days in culture; this is slightly lower than but comparable to values for a control grown on tissue culture dishes. Healthy neuron morphology is evident in both the devices and controls. We demonstrate the ability to use hydrostatic pressure to isolate insults to one compartment and, thus, expose localized areas of neurons to insults applied in soluble form. Due to the high resistance of the microgrooves for fluid transport, insults are contained in the neuritic compartment without appreciable leakage into the somal compartment for over 15 h. Finally, we demonstrate the use of polylysine patterning in combination with the microfabricated device to facilitate identification and visualization of neurons. The ability to direct sites of neuronal attachment and orientation of neurite outgrowth by micropatterning techniques, combined with fluidically isolated compartments within the culture area, offers significant advantages over standard open culture methods and other conventional methods for manipulating distinct neuronal microenvironments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ivins, K. J., Bui, E. T. N., & Cotman, C. W. (1998) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1006/nbdi.1998.0228 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Cited by
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Abgrall, P., & Gué, A.-M. (2007) · Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/5/r01 · Cited by 561
Nanomaterials for Neural Interfaces
Kotov, N. A., Winter, J. O., Clements, I. P., Jan, E., Timko, B. P., Campidelli, S., Pathak, S., Mazzatenta, A., Lieber, C. M., Prato, M., et al. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200801984 · Cited by 504
Microfluidics technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells
Yi, C., Li, C.-W., Ji, S., & Yang, M. (2006) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2005.12.037 · Cited by 478
Biosensor technology: recent advances in threat agent detection and medicine
Kirsch, J., Siltanen, C., Zhou, Q., Revzin, A., & Simonian, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60141b · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, A. M., Rhee, S. W., Tu, C. H., Cribbs, D. H., Cotman, C. W., & Jeon, N. L.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-12-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1551-1556
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W4249587697
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfluidic Multicompartment Device for Neuroscience Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/la026417v
- The paper
- Taylor, A. M., Rhee, S. W., Tu, C. H., Cribbs, D. H., Cotman, C. W., & Jeon, N. L. (2003). Microfluidic Multicompartment Device for Neuroscience Research. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/la026417v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.