The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Micromixing of Miscible Liquids in Segmented Gas−Liquid Flow
Abstract
We present an integrated microfluidic system that achieves efficient mixing between two miscible liquid streams by introducing a gas phase, forming a segmented gas-liquid (slug) flow, and completely separating the mixed liquid and gas streams in a planar capillary separator. The recirculation motion associated with segmented flow enhances advection in straight microchannels without requiring additional fabrication steps. Instantaneous velocity fields are quantified by microscopic particle image velocimetry (muPIV). Velocities in the direction normal to the channel amount to approximately 30% of the bulk liquid velocity inside a liquid segment. This value depends only weakly on the length of a liquid segment. Spatial concentration fields and the extent of mixing (EOM) are obtained from pulsed-laser fluorescence microscopy and confocal scanning microscopy measurements. The mixing length is reduced 2-3-fold in comparison with previously reported chaotic micromixers that use three-dimensional microchannel networks or patterned walls. Segmented gas-liquid microflows allow mixing times to be varied over several orders of magnitude between milliseconds and second time scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Flow Chemistry
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K., & Seeberger, P. H. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00183 · Cited by 1,995
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b820557b · Cited by 1,647
Seemann, R., Brinkmann, M., Pfohl, T., & Herminghaus, S. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/1/016601 · Cited by 1,049
Multiphase microfluidics: from flow characteristics to chemical and materials synthesis
Günther, A., & Jensen, K. F. (2006) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/b609851g · Cited by 983
Self-citationSynthesis of micro and nanostructures in microfluidic systems
Marre, S., & Jensen, K. F. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b821324k · Cited by 734
Self-citationMicrochemical systems for continuous-flow synthesis
Hartman, R. L., & Jensen, K. F. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b906343a · Cited by 508
Self-citationA platform for automated nanomole-scale reaction screening and micromole-scale synthesis in flow
Perera, D., Tucker, J. W., Brahmbhatt, S., Helal, C. J., Chong, A., Farrell, W., Richardson, P., & Sach, N. W. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9112 · Cited by 465
The pressure drop along rectangular microchannels containing bubbles
Fuerstman, M. J., Lai, A., Thurlow, M. E., Shevkoplyas, S. S., Stone, H. A., & Whitesides, G. M. (2007) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b706549c · Cited by 377
Yen, B. K. H., Günther, A., Schmidt, M. A., Jensen, K. F., & Bawendi, M. G. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200500792 · Cited by 293
Self-citationManaging Solids in Microreactors for the Upstream Continuous Processing of Fine Chemicals
Hartman, R. L. (2012) · Organic Process Research & Development · doi:10.1021/op200348t · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Günther, A., Jhunjhunwala, M., Thalmann, M., Schmidt, M. A., & Jensen, K. F.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-01-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1547-1555
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W1995711629
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.