Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Sheets by a Combined Chemical and Hydrothermal Reduction of Graphene Oxide

Long, Donghui, Li, Wei, Ling, Licheng, Miyawaki, Jin, Mochida, Isao, Yoon, Seong-Ho·2010·Langmuir
DOI 10.1021/la102425a
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Nitrogen-doped graphene sheets were prepared through a hydrothermal reduction of colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide in the presence of hydrazine and ammonia at pH of 10. The effect of hydrothermal temperature on the structure, morphology, and surface chemistry of as-prepared graphene sheets were investigated though XRD, N(2) adsorption, solid-state (13)C NMR, SEM, TEM, and XPS characterizations. Oxygen reduction and nitrogen doping were achieved simultaneously under the hydrothermal reaction. Up to 5% nitrogen-doped graphene sheets with slightly wrinkled and folded feature were obtained at the relative low hydrothermal temperature. With the increase of hydrothermal temperature, the nitrogen content decreased slightly and more pyridinic N incorporated into the graphene network. Meanwhile, a jellyfish-like graphene structure was formed by self-organization of graphene sheets at the hydrothermal temperature of 160 °C. Further increase of the temperature to 200 °C, graphene sheets could self-aggregate into agglomerate particles but still contained doping level of 4 wt % N. The unique hydrothermal environment should play an important role in the nitrogen doping and the jellyfish-like graphene formation. This simple hydrothermal method could provide the synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene sheets in large scale for various practical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la102425a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Katsnelson M. I., 2007, Mater. Today, 10, 20, 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71788-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Novoselov K. S., 2005, Nature, 438, 197, 10.1038/nature04233 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Charrier A., 2002, J. Appl. Phys., 92, 2479, 10.1063/1.1498962 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Zhang W. X., 2009, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 48, 5864, 10.1002/anie.200902365 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dikin D. A., 2007, Nature, 448, 457, 10.1038/nature06016 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Szabo T., 2006, Carbon, 44, 537, 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.08.005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Park S., 2008, ACS Nano, 2, 572, 10.1021/nn700349a · DOI · Paper page
  8. Stankovich S., 2007, Carbon, 45, 1558, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Zhou Y., 2009, Chem. Mater., 21, 2950, 10.1021/cm9006603 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Brodie B. C., 1859, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 149, 249, 10.1098/rstl.1859.0013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Staudenmaier L., 1898, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 31, 1481, 10.1002/cber.18980310237 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hummers W. S., 1958, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 1339, 10.1021/ja01539a017 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kovtyukhova N. I., 1999, Chem. Mater., 11, 771, 10.1021/cm981085u · DOI · Paper page
  14. He H. Y., 1996, J. Phys. Chem., 100, 19954, 10.1021/jp961563t · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lerf A., 1998, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 4477, 10.1021/jp9731821 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Paredes J. I., 2008, Langmuir, 24, 10560, 10.1021/la801744a · DOI · Paper page
  17. Stankovich S., 2007, Carbon, 45, 1558, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Shin H. J., 2009, Adv. Funct. Mater., 19, 1987, 10.1002/adfm.200900167 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Wang G., 2008, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 8192, 10.1021/jp710931h · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fan X., 2008, Adv. Mater., 20, 4490, 10.1002/adma.200801306 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kudin K. N., 2007, Nano Lett., 8, 36, 10.1021/nl071822y · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liu Z. B., 2009, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 9681, 10.1021/jp9004357 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wang X. R., 2009, Science, 324, 768, 10.1126/science.1170335 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Li X. L., 2009, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 15939, 10.1021/ja907098f · DOI · Paper page
  25. Wei D. C., 2009, Nano Lett., 9, 1752, 10.1021/nl803279t · DOI · Paper page
  26. Buchsteiner A., 2006, J. Phys. Chem. B, 110, 22328, 10.1021/jp0641132 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Byrappa K., 2001, Handbook of Hydrothermal Technology: A Technology for Crystal Growth and Materials Processing
  28. Zalan Z., 2005, Curr. Org. Chem., 9, 357, 10.2174/1385272053174949 · DOI
  29. Stankovich S., 2007, Carbon, 45, 1558, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Neidlein R., 1982, Chem. Ber., 115, 2898, 10.1002/cber.19821150820 · doi:10.1002/cber.19821150820

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Long, D., Li, W., Ling, L., Miyawaki, J., Mochida, I., & Yoon, S.-H.
Venue
Langmuir
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2010-09-23
Volume
26
Issue
20
Pages
16096-16102
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
DOI
10.1021/la102425a
OpenAlex
W1971745686
Cited by
729
References
4
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.