Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface and Size Effects on Cell Interaction of Gold Nanoparticles with Both Phagocytic and Nonphagocytic Cells

Liu, Xiangsheng, Huang, Nan, Li, Huan, Jin, Qiao, Ji, Jian·2013·Langmuir

Abstract

With the development of nanotechnology and its application in biomedicine, studies on the interaction between nanoparticles and cells have become increasingly important. To understand the surface and size effects on cell interaction of nanoparticles, the cellular uptake behaviors of two series of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with both positively and negatively charged surfaces and sizes range from ~16 to ~58 nm were investigated in both phagocytic RAW 264.7 and nonphagocytic HepG2 cells. The internalization of AuNPs was quantified by ICP-MS, and the intracellular fate of NPs was evaluated by TEM analysis. The results showed that the AuNPs with positive surface charge have much higher cell internalization ability than those with negative surface charge in nonphagocytic HepG2 cells. However, the uptake extent of negatively charged AuNPs was similar with that of the positively charged AuNPs when in phagocytic RAW 264.7 cells. Among the tested size range, negatively charged AuNPs with a diameter of ~40 nm had the highest uptake in both cells, while the positively charged AuNPs did not show a certain tendency. Intracellular TEM analysis demonstrated the different fate of AuNPs in different cells, where both the positively and negatively charged AuNPs were mainly trapped in the lysosomes in HepG2 cells, but many of them were localized in phagosomes when in RAW 264.7 cells. Cytotoxicity of these AuNPs was tested by both MTT and LDH assays, which suggested NP's toxicity is closely related to the tested cell types besides the surface and size of NPs. It demonstrates that cell interaction between nanoparticles and cells is not only affected by surface and size factors but also strongly depends on cell types.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/la401556k

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 209

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Huang, N., Li, H., Jin, Q., & Ji, J.
Venue
Langmuir
Published
2013-07-11
Volume
29
Issue
29
Pages
9138-9148
ISSN
  • 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5827
OpenAlex
W2020640674
Cited by
209
References
7
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.