Cited by 33biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyPolymer crystallization and properties

Low-Temperature Processable Degradable Polyesters

Open access
Taniguchi, Ikuo, Lovell, Nathan G.·2012·Macromolecules

Abstract

Block copolymers composed of a low-T(g) and high-T(g) block, with suitable pressure miscibility characteristics, can be formed at low-temperature through the application of pressure. Aliphatic block copolyesters composed of poly(ε-caprolactone) derivatives and poly(L-lactide) show room temperature processability under hydraulic pressure of 34.5 MPa without polymer degradation. Mechanism of the pressure-induced flow is investigated by small-angle X-ray scattering. A scattering associated with a lamellae structure observed at ambient conditions decreases with elevating hydrostatic pressures, indicating pressure-induced phase mixing. Traces of the pressure-induced phase transition are studied by differential scanning calorimetry and X-ray diffraction. Tensile test of the block copolymers reveals that the mechanical properties can be readily controlled by changing composition, molecular weight, and chemical structure of the blocks. Among them, the hard segment PLLA fraction is the key factor to characterize the properties. Young's modulus of the block copolyesters is similar to that of polyethylene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma301230y

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PLA-b-PCL shows room temperature processability under hydraulic pressure of 34.5 MPa without polymer degradation.

    “Taniguchi et al [25] revealed that PLA-b-PCL showed room temperature processability under hydraulic pressure of 34.5 MPa without polymer degradation.”

    From Simultaneously Toughening and Strengthening of PLA-b-PCL Copolymer via Pressure-induced-flow Processing at Room Temperature (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Experimental Section (Processing of block copolymers; page not provided) confirms use of 34.5 MPa but says PCL-b-PLLA was pressed at 65 °C, not room temperature. Results and Discussion (Low-temperature processing; page not provided) explicitly says it could not be processed at 25 °C. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior work did not address the effect of pressure or reprocessing times on mechanical properties of PLA-b-PCL.

    “However, they did not mention the effect of either pressure or reprocessing times on mechanical properties of PLA-b-PCL.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [4]Doi Y Steinbüchel A Biopolymers, Polyester II-Properties and Chemical Synthesis 2002 Wiley-VCH Weinheim
  2. [5]Doi Y Steinbüchel A Biopolymers, Polyester III-Applications and Commercial Products 2002 Wiley-VCH Weinheim
  3. [11]Honda N Taniguchi I Miyamoto M Kimura Y Macromol. Biosci 2003 3 189 197 15468228
  4. [28]Lovell NG MS. Thesis 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology USA
  5. [30]van Krevelen DW Hoftyzer PJ Properties of Polymers 1972 Correlation with Chemical Structure; Elsevier New York
  6. [32]Kricheldorf HR Kreiser-Saunders I Boettcher C Polymer 1995 36 1253 1259
  7. [42]Cristina M Martins L Ratner BD Hoffman AS Schoen FJ Lemons JE Biomaterials Science 2004 819 821 Elsevier Boston 2nd ed
  8. [43]DeLassus PT Whiteman NF Brandrup J Immergut EH Grulke EA Abe A Bloch DR Polymer Handbook 1998 1 V/159 169 Wiley-Interscience 4th ed

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taniguchi, I., & Lovell, N. G.
Affiliations
  • Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (JP)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Taniguchi, Ikuo
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2012-09-14
Volume
45
Issue
18
Pages
7420-7428
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2018338001
Cited by
33
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54gm064346-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54-GM064346, R01GM059870)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
Keywords
block copolyesters, polycaprolactone, poly(L-lactic acid), pressure-driven flow, hydrostatic pressure, lamellar structure, pressure-induced phase transition, mechanical properties, Young's modulus, hard segment, biodegradable polyesters, block copolymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review