The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cutinase-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Abstract
A detailed study and comparison was made on the catalytic activities of cutinases from Humilica insolens (HiC), Pseudomonas mendocina (PmC), and Fusarium solani (FsC) using low-crystallinity ( lc ) and biaxially oriented ( bo ) poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) films as model substrates. Cutinase activity for PET hydrolysis was assayed using a pH-stat to measure NaOH consumption versus time, where initial activity was expressed as units of micromoles of NaOH added per hour and per milliliter of reaction volume. HiC was found to have good thermostability with maximum initial activity from 70 to 80 °C, whereas PmC and FsC performed best at 50 °C. Assays by pH-stat showed that the cutinases had about 10-fold higher activity for the lc PET (7% crystallinity) than for the bo PET (35% crystallinity). Under optimal reaction conditions, initial activities of cutinases were successfully fit by a heterogeneous kinetic model. The hydrolysis rate constant k 2 was 7-fold higher for HiC at 70 °C (0.62 μmol/cm 2 /h) relative to PmC and FsC at 50 and 40 °C, respectively. With respect to PET affinity, PmC had the highest affinity, while FsC had the lowest value. In a 96 h degradation study using lc PET films, incubation with PmC and FsC both resulted in a 5% film weight loss at 50 and 40 °C, respectively. In contrast, HiC-catalyzed lc PET film hydrolysis at 70 °C resulted in a 97 ± 3% weight loss in 96 h, corresponding to a loss in film thickness of 30 μm per day. As degradation of lc PET progressed, crystallinity of the remaining film increased to 27% due to preferential degradation of amorphous regions. Furthermore, for all three cutinases, analysis of aqueous soluble degradation products showed that they consist exclusively of terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mukai, K., Yamada, K., & Doi, Y. (1993) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/0141-8130(93)90054-p · Cited by 143
Cited by
A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Yoshida, S., Hiraga, K., Takehana, T., Taniguchi, I., Yamaji, H., Maeda, Y., Toyohara, K., Miyamoto, K., Kimura, Y., & Oda, K. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad6359 · Cited by 3,367
An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles
Tournier, V., Topham, C. M., Gilles, A., David, B., Folgoas, C., Moya-Leclair, E., Kamionka, E., Desrousseaux, M.-L., Texier, H., Gavalda, S., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4 · Cited by 2,176
Microbial and Enzymatic Degradation of Synthetic Plastics
Mohanan, N., Montazer, Z., Sharma, P. K., & Levin, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.580709 · Cited by 1,122
Expanding plastics recycling technologies: chemical aspects, technology status and challenges
Li, H., Aguirre-Villegas, H. A., Allen, R. D., Bai, X., Benson, C. H., Beckham, G. T., Bradshaw, S. L., Brown, J. L., Brown, R. C., Cecon, V. S., et al. (2022) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc02588d · Cited by 616
Microbial Degradation and Valorization of Plastic Wastes
Ru, J., Huo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00442 · Cited by 609
Metadata
- Authors
- Ronkvist, Å. M., Xie, W., Lu, W., & Gross, R. A.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-07-02
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5128-5138
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W1984158048
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cutinase-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Poly(ethylene terephthalate). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma9005318
- The paper
- Ronkvist, Å. M., Xie, W., Lu, W., & Gross, R. A. (2009). Cutinase-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Poly(ethylene terephthalate). Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9005318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.