Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cellulose Solutions in Water Containing Metal Complexes

Saalwächter, Kay, Burchard, Walther, Klüfers, Peter, Kettenbach, G., Mayer, Peter, Klemm, Dieter, Dugarmaa, Saran·2000·Macromolecules

Abstract

Aqueous solutions of a number of metal complexes have been found to dissolve cellulose. Recently, a number of new metal complexes have been developed that completely dissolve cellulose by deprotonating and coordinative binding the hydroxyl groups in the C2 and C3 position of the anhydro glucose. A detailed comparative light scattering study is given for cellulose in Schweizer's reagent (cuoxam), Ni-tren, and Cd-tren. Cuoxam is the well-known solution of cupric hydroxide in aqueous ammonia, and the abbreviation tren stands for tris(2-aminoethyl)amine. Cuoxam and Ni-tren are deep blue solvents. The light scattering measurements were carried out with the blue line of an argon ion laser at wavelength λ 0 = 457.9 nm, and the data from these solvents required an absorption correction according to the Lambert−Beer law. Cd-tren is almost colorless, and the data could be used without correction. Because of traces of colloid particles, possibly originating from the metal hydroxides, a special treatment for optical clarification became necessary. A large number of samples, cotton linters, various pulp celluloses, and bacterial celluloses, were studied. All three solvents exhibited good solution properties, but only Cd-tren was capable of dissolving also the highest degrees of polymerization of cotton linters and bacterial cellulose (DP w = 9700). The limits for the two other solvents were DP w < 6300 for Ni-tren and DP w < 5300 for cuoxam. A fairly high chain stiffness was found with Kuhn segment lengths of l K = 15.8 ± 1.4 nm for Cd-tren, l K = 10.2 ± 0.8 nm for Ni-tren, and l K = 13.1 ± 1.2 nm for cuoxam, corresponding to characteristic ratios of C ∝ = 24.6, 15.4, and 19.4, respectively. The problem of preferential adsorption is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ma991893m

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Saalwächter, K., Burchard, W., Klüfers, P., Kettenbach, G., Mayer, P., Klemm, D., & Dugarmaa, S.
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
4094-4107
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W2172029028
Cited by
160
References
0
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellulose Solutions in Water Containing Metal Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ma991893m
The paper
Saalwächter, K., Burchard, W., Klüfers, P., Kettenbach, G., Mayer, P., Klemm, D., & Dugarmaa, S. (2000). Cellulose Solutions in Water Containing Metal Complexes. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma991893m

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.