The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cellulose Solutions in Water Containing Metal Complexes
Abstract
Aqueous solutions of a number of metal complexes have been found to dissolve cellulose. Recently, a number of new metal complexes have been developed that completely dissolve cellulose by deprotonating and coordinative binding the hydroxyl groups in the C2 and C3 position of the anhydro glucose. A detailed comparative light scattering study is given for cellulose in Schweizer's reagent (cuoxam), Ni-tren, and Cd-tren. Cuoxam is the well-known solution of cupric hydroxide in aqueous ammonia, and the abbreviation tren stands for tris(2-aminoethyl)amine. Cuoxam and Ni-tren are deep blue solvents. The light scattering measurements were carried out with the blue line of an argon ion laser at wavelength λ 0 = 457.9 nm, and the data from these solvents required an absorption correction according to the Lambert−Beer law. Cd-tren is almost colorless, and the data could be used without correction. Because of traces of colloid particles, possibly originating from the metal hydroxides, a special treatment for optical clarification became necessary. A large number of samples, cotton linters, various pulp celluloses, and bacterial celluloses, were studied. All three solvents exhibited good solution properties, but only Cd-tren was capable of dissolving also the highest degrees of polymerization of cotton linters and bacterial cellulose (DP w = 9700). The limits for the two other solvents were DP w < 6300 for Ni-tren and DP w < 5300 for cuoxam. A fairly high chain stiffness was found with Kuhn segment lengths of l K = 15.8 ± 1.4 nm for Cd-tren, l K = 10.2 ± 0.8 nm for Ni-tren, and l K = 13.1 ± 1.2 nm for cuoxam, corresponding to characteristic ratios of C ∝ = 24.6, 15.4, and 19.4, respectively. The problem of preferential adsorption is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellulose: Fascinating Biopolymer and Sustainable Raw Material
Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H., & Bohn, A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200460587 · Cited by 7,551
Self-citationZhang, H., Wu, J., Zhang, J., & He, J. (2005) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma0505676 · Cited by 1,437
Ionic liquid processing of cellulose
Wang, H., Gurau, G., & Rogers, R. D. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15311d · Cited by 1,369
Bacterial synthesized cellulose — artificial blood vessels for microsurgery
Klemm, D., Schumann, D., Udhardt, U., & Marsch, S. (2001) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00021-1 · Cited by 1,334
Self-citationUnconventional methods in cellulose functionalization
Heinze, T., & Liebert, T. (2001) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00022-3 · Cited by 891
Sen, S., Martin, J. D., & Argyropoulos, D. S. (2013) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc400085a · Cited by 302
Cellulose Solvents – Remarkable History, Bright Future
Liebert, T. (2010) · ACS Symposium Series · doi:10.1021/bk-2010-1033.ch001 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Saalwächter, K., Burchard, W., Klüfers, P., Kettenbach, G., Mayer, P., Klemm, D., & Dugarmaa, S.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4094-4107
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2172029028
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.