Cited by 59Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesDNA and Biological ComputingNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

Rewritable Memory by Controllable Nanopatterning of DNA

Shin, Jong-Shik, Pierce, Niles A.·2004·Nano Letters

Abstract

Fabricating a nanostructure capable of reversibly patterning molecules is a fundamental goal within nanotechnology, underlying diverse processes such as information storage, scaffold-assisted assembly, and molecular transport. Here, we describe a DNA scaffold supporting a one-dimensional array of independently and reversibly addressable sites at 7 nm spacing. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate robust functioning of the device as rewritable memory. The bit state of each address is controlled by specific DNA strands with external readout provided by fluorescence measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl049658r

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an alternative approach, five single-stranded nucleotides were annealed together to form an assembly with three addressable overhangs; when complementary strands to each of these overhangs were introduced, the site changed from a "0" (single-stranded) to a "1" (double-stranded) state, which could then be reversed using strand displacement.

    “In an alternative approach, five single-stranded nucleotides were annealed together to form an assembly with three addressable overhangs; when complementary strands to each of these overhangs were introduced, the site changed from a “0” (single-stranded) to a “1” (double-stranded) state, which could then be reversed using strand displacement.115”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yan H., 2003, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 8108
  2. Mao C., 1999, Nature, 395, 146

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, J.-S., & Pierce, N. A.
Affiliations
California Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2004-04-13
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
905-909
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2129953908
Cited by
59
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Keywords
DNA nanotechnology, DNA scaffolds, nanopatterning, rewritable memory, DNA origami, fluorescence readout, information storage, molecular transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review