Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 393

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational Growth of Branched and Hyperbranched Nanowire Structures

Wang, Deli, Qian, Fang, Yang, Chen, Zhong, Zhaohui, Lieber, Charles M.·2004·Nano Letters

Abstract

Branched and hyperbranched nanowire structures were synthesized via a multistep nanocluster-catalyzed vapor−liquid−solid approach. Scanning electron microscopy studies of silicon nanowire structures prepared in this way confirmed the formation of branched nanostructures and showed that the branch density could be controlled by the nanocluster catalyst concentration. This same approach was also used to grow branched gallium nitride nanowires. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy studies of the branched silicon nanowire structures revealed that the branches grew epitaxially as single-crystal nanowires from the silicon nanowire backbone. In addition, hyperbranched silicon nanowire structures were prepared in a controlled manner by repeating the catalyst deposition and nanowire growth steps. The ability to prepare rationally branched and hyperbranched nanowires should open up new opportunities for both fundamental research and applications, including three-dimensional nanoelectronics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl049728u

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 393

Metadata

Authors
Wang, D., Qian, F., Yang, C., Zhong, Z., & Lieber, C. M.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2004-03-31
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
871-874
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2134449823
Cited by
393
References
20
FWCI
18.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.