Cited by 806Analytical Chemistry and SensorsNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensors

Importance of the Debye Screening Length on Nanowire Field Effect Transistor Sensors

Open access
Stern, Eric, Wagner, Robin, Sigworth, Fred J., Breaker, Ronald, Fahmy, Tarek M., Reed, Mark A.·2007·Nano Letters

Abstract

Nanowire field effect transistors (NW-FETs) can serve as ultrasensitive detectors for label-free reagents. The NW-FET sensing mechanism assumes a controlled modification in the local channel electric field created by the binding of charged molecules to the nanowire surface. Careful control of the solution Debye length is critical for unambiguous selective detection of macromolecules. Here we show the appropriate conditions under which the selective binding of macromolecules is accurately sensed with NW-FET sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl071792z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential distribution of the channel surface determines the electron concentration of the transistor and is closely correlated to the amount of drain current inside the biosensor.

    “The potential distribution of the channel surface determines the electron concentration of the transistor and is closely correlated to the amount of drain current inside the biosensor [37].”
  • The immune-sensor has an inherent impediment in determining bio-molecules that is induced by the Debye screening length.

    “Among them, the immune-sensor has an inherent impediment in determining bio-molecules that is induced by the Debye screening length910, despite the current need of femtomolar detection for early-stage diagnosis of diseases.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stern, E., Wagner, R., Sigworth, F. J., Breaker, R., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fahmy, Tarek M.
  • Reed, Mark A.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2007-10-03
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
3405-3409
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W1968221386
Cited by
806
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 41
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB008260)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Bioengineering › Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Keywords
nanowire field-effect transistors, Debye length, label-free detection, macromolecule binding, selective detection, channel electric field
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, DNA, DNA, Single-Stranded, Light, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Molecular Conformation, Temperature, Transistors, Electronic, Models, Statistical, Biosensing Techniques, Streptavidin, Nanotechnology, Macromolecular Substances, Nanowires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review