Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secondary Branching and Nitrogen Doping of ZnO Nanotetrapods: Building a Highly Active Network for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting

Qiu, Yongcai, Yan, Keyou, Deng, Hong, Yang, Shihe·2012·Nano Letters

Abstract

A photoanode based on ZnO nanotetrapods, which feature good vectorial electron transport and network forming ability, has been developed for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Two strategies have been validated in significantly enhancing light harvesting. The first was demonstrated through a newly developed branch-growth method to achieve secondary and even higher generation branching of the nanotetrapods. Nitrogen-doping represents the second strategy. The pristine ZnO nanotetrapod anode yielded a photocurrent density higher than those of the corresponding nanowire devices reported so far. This photocurrent density was significantly increased for the new photoanode architecture based on the secondary branched ZnO nanotetrapods. After N-doping, the photocurrent density enjoyed an even more dramatic enhancement to 0.99 mA/cm(2) at +0.31 V vs Ag/AgCl. The photocurrent enhancement is attributed to the greatly increased roughness factor for boosting light harvesting associated with the ZnO nanotetrapod branching, and the increased visible light absorption due to the N-doping induced band gap narrowing of ZnO.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/nl2037326

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Qiu, Y., Yan, K., Deng, H., & Yang, S.
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2011-12-16
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
407-413
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2015806261
Cited by
406
References
29
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.