The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twinning and Twisting of Tri- and Bilayer Graphene
Abstract
The electronic, optical, and mechanical properties of bilayer and trilayer graphene vary with their structure, including the stacking order and relative twist, providing novel ways to realize useful characteristics not available to single layer graphene. However, developing controlled growth of bilayer and trilayer graphene requires efficient large-scale characterization of multilayer graphene structures. Here, we use dark-field transmission electron microscopy for rapid and accurate determination of key structural parameters (twist angle, stacking order, and interlayer spacing) of few-layer CVD graphene. We image the long-range atomic registry for oriented bilayer and trilayer graphene, find that it conforms exclusively to either Bernal or rhombohedral stacking, and determine their relative abundances. In contrast, our data on twisted multilayers suggest the absence of such long-range atomic registry. The atomic registry and its absence are consistent with the two different strain-induced deformations we observe; by tilting the samples to break mirror symmetry, we find a high density of twinned domains in oriented multilayer graphene, where multiple domains of two different stacking configurations coexist, connected by discrete twin boundaries. In contrast, individual layers in twisted regions continuously stretch and shear independently, forming elaborate Moiré patterns. These results, and the twist angle distribution in our CVD graphene, can be understood in terms of an angle-dependent interlayer potential model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect
Castro, E. V., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Peres, N. M. R., dos Santos, J. M. B. L., Nilsson, J., Guinea, F., Geim, A. K., & Neto, A. H. C. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.216802 · Cited by 2,033
Cited by
Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering
Shin, S. R., Li, Y.-C., Jang, H. L., Khoshakhlagh, P., Akbari, M., Nasajpour, A., Zhang, Y. S., Tamayol, A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.007 · Cited by 721
Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene
Yoo, H., Engelke, R., Carr, S., Fang, S., Zhang, K., Cazeaux, P., Sung, S. H., Hovden, R., Tsen, A. W., Taniguchi, T., et al. (2019) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0346-z · Cited by 708
Self-citationBunck, D. N., & Dichtel, W. R. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja408243n · Cited by 507
Sahabudeen, H., Qi, H., Glatz, B. A., Tranca, D., Dong, R., Hou, Y., Zhang, T., Kuttner, C., Lehnert, T., Seifert, G., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13461 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, L., Hovden, R., Huang, P., Wojcik, M., Muller, D. A., & Park, J.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-02-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1609-1615
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2319289952
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.