Cited by 2,039Graphene research and applications2D Materials and ApplicationsQuantum and electron transport phenomena

Biased Bilayer Graphene: Semiconductor with a Gap Tunable by the Electric Field Effect

Open access
Castro, Eduardo V., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Peres, N. M. R., dos Santos, J. M. B. Lopes, Nilsson, Johan, Guinea, F., Geim, A. K. +1 more·2007·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

We demonstrate that the electronic gap of a graphene bilayer can be controlled externally by applying a gate bias. From the magnetotransport data (Shubnikov-de Haas measurements of the cyclotron mass), and using a tight-binding model, we extract the value of the gap as a function of the electronic density. We show that the gap can be changed from zero to midinfrared energies by using fields of less, approximately < 1 V/nm, below the electric breakdown of SiO2. The opening of a gap is clearly seen in the quantum Hall regime.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper reports that bilayer graphene can be converted into a semiconductor whose band gap is externally tunable by gate bias, with the gap ranging from zero to mid-infrared energies. Magnetotransport measurements and tight-binding modeling show clear gap signatures, including a zero Hall conductivity plateau and an asymmetric cyclotron mass.

Key findings

  • In biased bilayer graphene, a plateau at zero Hall conductivity appears at the neutrality point, unlike the pristine case; the longitudinal resistivity at neutrality exceeded 150 kΩ at 4 K for the biased device, compared with 6 kΩ for the unbiased device under the same conditions.
  • The cyclotron mass depends asymmetrically on carrier density, and comparison with tight-binding theory yields an interlayer hopping parameter of 0.22 eV and indicates gaps larger than 0.2 eV.
  • A small-bias linear fit to the screened theory gives a gap of about 1.2 meV per volt relative to a gate voltage of 25 V, while the theory predicts gap saturation at the interlayer hopping scale.
  • The model agrees well with angle-resolved photoemission data, except in the gap saturation regime around densities of about 50 × 10¹² cm⁻².

Methods

  • Bilayer graphene devices were prepared by micromechanical cleavage on 300 nm SiO₂ and patterned into Hall bars; carrier density was controlled by a Si backgate and by NH₃ chemical doping, with transport measured by lock-in techniques in fields up to 12 T and temperatures from 4 to 300 K.
  • Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations were measured versus temperature and fitted to extract the cyclotron mass as a function of carrier density.
  • The data were interpreted with a Bernal-stacked bilayer tight-binding model using in-plane hopping of 3.1 eV and interlayer hopping of 0.22 eV, including a self-consistent Hartree treatment of screening; Hall conductivity was modeled for a zigzag-edged ribbon in a magnetic field.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the Hartree approach is reliable only when the gap is small compared with the interlayer hopping; for hole doping it underestimates the cyclotron mass while the unscreened model overestimates it, so the true gap lies between these limits and a better screening treatment is needed when the electrostatic energy becomes comparable to the interlayer hopping.
  • The paper notes that the comparison with angle-resolved photoemission data works well except in the gap saturation regime at high density.
  • Evident from the text: for the transport devices, the gap values are inferred by fitting a tight-binding/Hartree model to magnetotransport rather than measured directly by a spectroscopic probe.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.99.216802

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 8 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The opening of a gap in biased bilayer graphene is clearly seen in the quantum Hall regime.

    “The opening of a gap is clearly seen in the quantum Hall regime.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The zero Hall conductivity plateau is absent in the unbiased bilayer.

    “which is absent in the unbiased case”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    By comparing observed behavior with tight-binding results, the gap can be tuned to values larger than 0.2 eV.

    “by comparing the observed behavior with our tightbinding results, we show that the gap can be tuned to values larger than 0.2 eV”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the biased device, the longitudinal resistivity xx at n=0 exceeded 150 kOhm at 4 K, compared to 6 kOhm for the unbiased case under the same conditions.

    “in the biased device, xx at n 0 exceeded 150 kOhm at 4 K, as compared to 6 kOhm for the unbiased case under the same conditions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In a magnetic field, a pronounced plateau at zero Hall conductivity is found for the biased bilayer.

    “in a magnetic field, a pronounced plateau at zero Hall conductivity xy 0 is found for the biased bilayer”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The N=0 plateau is absent in the unbiased bilayer, so that a double step of 8e2/h in height occurs at n=0, indicating a metallic state at the neutrality point.

    “The N 0 plateau is strikingly absent, so that a double step of 8e 2 =h in height occurs at n 0, indicating a metallic state at the neutrality point [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] 3. K. S. Novoselov et al., Nature Phys. 2, 177 (2006).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the biased bilayer, two flat bands with energies -eV/2 and eV/2 appear, and the other two zero energy bands become dispersive inside the gap, showing band-crossing.

    “In this case two flat bands with energies ÿeV=2 and eV=2 appear, similar to the case of zero magnetic field.The other two zero energy bands become dispersive inside the gap, showing the band-crossing phenomenon.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the hole doping region, the Hartree approach underestimates the value of mc whereas the simple unscreened result overestimates it.

    “In the hole doping region in Fig. 1(b), the Hartree approach underestimates the value of m c whereas the simple unscreened result overestimates it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The emerged zero Hall plateau was accompanied by a huge peak in longitudinal resistivity, indicating an insulating state.

    “The emerged plateau was accompanied by a huge peak in longitudinal resistivity xx , indicating an insulating state”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The asymmetry of cyclotron mass with carrier density provides a clear signature of a gap and allows its estimate.

    “which provides a clear signature of a gap and allows its estimate”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The theory was cross-checked against angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) data and found excellent agreement.

    “we have cross-checked our theory against angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) data [8] and found excellent agreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] 8. Theory of the gap opening within the continuum model was previously given by E. McCann, Phys. Rev. B 74, 161403 (2006).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Zero potential difference and zero gap are expected at n=2n0 in both unscreened and screened cases.

    “Zero potential difference and zero gap are expected at n 2n 0 in both unscreened and screened cases, as seen from Eqs. (1) and ( 2) and the fact that nn; 0 0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The charge in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer is equal to -ne/2.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the zero Hall plateau the current carried around the ribbon loop is zero, which implies a diverging longitudinal resistivity at low T.

    “Note that at the zero Hall plateau the current carried around the ribbon loop is zero, I 0, which implies, from the theory view point, a diverging longitudinal resistivity at low T”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The valley asymmetry opens a gap of eV in size in the zero energy Landau levels.

    “This opens a gap of eV in size.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data

    At n=3.6×10^12 cm^-2 the gap closes and the theoretical value becomes independent of the screening assumptions.

    “At this particular density the gap closes and the theoretical value becomes independent of the screening assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    A more accurate treatment of screening is needed when eV becomes of the order of t⊥.

    “a more accurate treatment of screening is needed when eV becomes of the order of t ? .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The coefficient 7.2×10^10 cm^-2/V is determined by the geometry of the resulting capacitor and is in agreement with values found experimentally.

    “The coefficient 7:2 10 10 cm ÿ2 =V is determined by the geometry of the resulting capacitor and is in agreement with the values of n 1 found experimentally [1][2][3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1][2][3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

12 of 12
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The charge in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer is equal to -ne/2.

    “Assuming equal charge ÿne=2 in layers 1 and 2 of the bilayer”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The breakdown field for SiO2 is 1 V/nm (i.e., 300 V for the used oxide thickness).

    “Note that the breakdown field for SiO 2 is 1 V=nm (i.e., 300 V for the used oxide thickness)”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The electric field induced between the two layers can be considered as a result of the effect of charged surfaces placed above and below bilayer graphene.

    “The electric field induced between the two layers can be considered as a result of the effect of charged surfaces placed above and below bilayer graphene .”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Laughlin is cited under the wrong reference number

    Minor

    The text attributes an argument to Laughlin [14], while the reference list assigns 14 to a note and lists Laughlin at 15.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castro, E. V., Novoselov, K. S., Morozov, S. V., Peres, N. M. R., dos Santos, J. M. B. L., Nilsson, J., Guinea, F., Geim, A. K., & Neto, A. H. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2007-11-20
Volume
99
Issue
21
Pages
216802-216802
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2113467957
Cited by
2,033
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 102 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 121 · 2016: 134 · 2015: 130 · 2014: 142 · 2013: 146 · 2012: 145
FWCI
55.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
Keywords
bilayer graphene, electric field effects, band gap tuning, gate bias, Shubnikov-de Haas effect, cyclotron mass, tight-binding model, quantum Hall effect, electron density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review