The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Long-Life, High-Rate Lithium/Sulfur Cell: A Multifaceted Approach to Enhancing Cell Performance
Open accessAbstract
Lithium/sulfur (Li/S) cells are receiving significant attention as an alternative power source for zero-emission vehicles and advanced electronic devices due to the very high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mA·h/g) of the sulfur cathode. However, the poor cycle life and rate capability have remained a grand challenge, preventing the practical application of this attractive technology. Here, we report that a Li/S cell employing a cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-modified sulfur-graphene oxide (S-GO) nanocomposite cathode can be discharged at rates as high as 6C (1C = 1.675 A/g of sulfur) and charged at rates as high as 3C while still maintaining high specific capacity (~ 800 mA·h/g of sulfur at 6C), with a long cycle life exceeding 1500 cycles and an extremely low decay rate (0.039% per cycle), perhaps the best performance demonstrated so far for a Li/S cell. The initial estimated cell-level specific energy of our cell was ~ 500 W·h/kg, which is much higher than that of current Li-ion cells (~ 200 W·h/kg). Even after 1500 cycles, we demonstrate a very high specific capacity (~ 740 mA·h/g of sulfur), which corresponds to ~ 414 mA·h/g of electrode: still higher than state-of-the-art Li-ion cells. Moreover, these Li/S cells with lithium metal electrodes can be cycled with an excellent Coulombic efficiency of 96.3% after 1500 cycles, which was enabled by our new formulation of the ionic liquid-based electrolyte. The performance we demonstrate herein suggests that Li/S cells may already be suitable for high-power applications such as power tools. Li/S cells may now provide a substantial opportunity for the development of zero-emission vehicles with a driving range similar to that of gasoline vehicles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
The rechargeable revolution: a better battery
Van Noorden, R. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/507026a · Cited by 1,047
Ionic liquids and derived materials for lithium and sodium batteries
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., Sun, X.-G., Hu, Y.-S., Xing, H., & Dai, S. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00464h · Cited by 601
Seh, Z. W., Yu, J. H., Li, W., Hsu, P.-C., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Yao, H., Zhang, Q., & Cui, Y. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6017 · Cited by 600
Progress Towards Commercially Viable Li–S Battery Cells
Urbonaite, S., Poux, T., & Novák, P. (2015) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201500118 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, M.-K., Zhang, Y., & Cairns, E. J.
- Venue
- Nano Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-11-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5891-5899
- ISSN
- 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-6992
- OpenAlex
- W2018008417
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 38.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Long-Life, High-Rate Lithium/Sulfur Cell: A Multifaceted Approach to Enhancing Cell Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/nl402793z
- The paper
- Song, M.-K., Zhang, Y., & Cairns, E. J. (2013). A Long-Life, High-Rate Lithium/Sulfur Cell: A Multifaceted Approach to Enhancing Cell Performance. Nano Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl402793z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.