The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-Order Targeted Brain Tumor Imaging by Using an Optical/Paramagnetic Nanoprobe across the Blood Brain Barrier
Abstract
Surgical resection is a mainstay of brain tumor treatments. However, the completed excision of malignant brain tumor is challenged by its infiltrative nature. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is widely used for defining brain tumor in clinic. However its ability in tumor visualization is hindered by the transient circulation lifetime, nontargeting specificity, and poor blood brain barrier (BBB) permeability of the commercially available MR contrast agents. In this work, we developed a two-order targeted nanoprobe in which MR/optical imaging reporters, tumor vasculature targeted cyclic [RGDyK] peptides, and BBB-permeable Angiopep-2 peptides are labeled on the PAMAM-G5 dendrimer. This nanoprobe is supposed to first target the α(V)β(3) integrin on tumor vasculatures. Increased local concentration of nanoprobe facilitates the association between BBB-permeable peptides and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) receptors on the vascular endothelial cells, which further accelerates BBB transverse of the nanoprobe via LRP receptor-mediated endocytosis. The nanoprobes that have penetrated the BBB secondly target the brain tumor because both α(V)β(3) integrin and LRP receptor are highly expressed on the tumor cells. In vivo imaging studies demonstrated that this nanoprobe not only efficiently crossed intact BBB in normal mice, but also precisely delineated the boundary of the orthotropic U87MG human glioblastoma xenograft with high target to background signal ratio. Overall, this two-order targeted nanoprobe holds the promise to noninvasively visualize brain tumors with uncompromised BBB and provides the possibility for real-time optical-image-guided brain tumor resection during surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases
Carmeliet, P., & Jain, R. K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35025220 · Cited by 9,070
Hynes (2002) · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00971-6 · Cited by 8,606
Structure and function of the blood–brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Patabendige, A. A. K., Dolman, D. E. M., Yusof, S. R., & Begley, D. J. (2010) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 · Cited by 5,185
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Shibata, M., Yamada, S., Kumar, S. R., Calero, M., Bading, J., Frangione, B., Holtzman, D. M., Miller, C. A., Strickland, D. K., Ghiso, J., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci10498 · Cited by 1,413
Cited by
The Use of Alternative Strategies for Enhanced Nanoparticle Delivery to Solid Tumors
Izci, M., Maksoudian, C., Manshian, B. B., & Soenen, S. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00779 · Cited by 506
Development of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Blood–Brain Barrier Transfer—Strategies and Challenges
Zhang, W., Mehta, A., Tong, Z., Esser, L., & Voelcker, N. H. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202003937 · Cited by 430
Multifunctional nanoparticles for brain tumor imaging and therapy
Cheng, Y., Morshed, R. A., Auffinger, B., Tobias, A. L., & Lesniak, M. S. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2013.09.006 · Cited by 349
Gao, H., Yang, Z., Zhang, S., Cao, S., Shen, S., Pang, Z., & Jiang, X. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02534 · Cited by 306
Batool, S., Nabipour, H., Ramakrishna, S., & Mozafari, M. (2022) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-022-02664-3 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, H., Wang, L., Wang, J., Weng, X., Lei, H., Wang, X., Jiang, L., Zhu, J., Lu, W., Wei, X., & Li, C.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-12-22
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 410-420
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2046164861
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.