The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulating Adaptive Immune Responses to Peptide Self-Assemblies
Open accessAbstract
Self-assembling peptides and peptide derivatives have received significant interest for several biomedical applications, including tissue engineering, wound healing, cell delivery, drug delivery, and vaccines. This class of materials has exhibited significant variability in immunogenicity, with many peptides eliciting no detectable antibody responses but others eliciting very strong responses without any supplemental adjuvants. Presently, strategies for either avoiding strong antibody responses or specifically inducing them are not well-developed, even though they are critical for the use of these materials both within tissue engineering and within immunotherapies. Here, we investigated the molecular determinants and immunological mechanisms leading to the significant immunogenicity of the self-assembling peptide OVA-Q11, which has been shown previously to elicit strong antibody responses in mice. We show that these responses can last for at least a year. Using adoptive transfer experiments and T cell knockout models, we found that these strong antibody responses were T cell-dependent, suggesting a route for avoiding or ensuring immunogenicity. Indeed, by deleting amino acid regions in the peptide recognized by T cells, immunogenicity could be significantly diminished. Immunogenicity could also be attenuated by mutating key residues in the self-assembling domain, thus preventing fibrillization. A second self-assembling peptide, KFE8, was also nonimmunogenic, but nanofibers of OVA-KFE8 elicited strong antibody responses similar to OVA-Q11, indicating that the adjuvant action was not dependent on the specific self-assembling peptide sequence. These findings will facilitate the design of self-assembled peptide biomaterials, both for applications where immunogenicity is undesirable and where it is advantageous.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hsieh, P. C. H. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci25878 · Cited by 357
Cited by
Towards organoid culture without Matrigel
Kozlowski, M. T., Crook, C. J., & Ku, H. T. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02910-8 · Cited by 409
Multicomponent peptide assemblies
Raymond, D. M., & Nilsson, B. L. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00115d · Cited by 346
Peptidic Biomaterials: From Self-Assembling to Regenerative Medicine
Pugliese, R., & Gelain, F. (2017) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.09.004 · Cited by 133
Accelerating the prediction and discovery of peptide hydrogels with human-in-the-loop
Xu, T., Wang, J., Zhao, S., Chen, D., Zhang, H., Fang, Y., Kong, N., Zhou, Z., Li, W., & Wang, H. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-39648-2 · Cited by 132
Peptides for Vaccine Development
Hamley, I. W. (2022) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.1c01238 · Cited by 104
Tiwari, P., Yadav, K., Shukla, R. P., Gautam, S., Marwaha, D., Sharma, M., & Mishra, P. R. (2023) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.09.016 · Cited by 88
Thermal stability of self-assembled peptide vaccine materials
Sun, T., Han, H., Hudalla, G. A., Wen, Y., Pompano, R. R., & Collier, J. H. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.019 · Cited by 76
Self-citationEngineering Nano‐Therapeutics to Boost Adoptive Cell Therapy for Cancer Treatment
Zheng, C., Zhang, J., Chan, H. F., Hu, H., Lv, S., Na, N., Tao, Y., & Li, M. (2021) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202001191 · Cited by 61
Vigneswaran, Y., Han, H., De Loera, R., Wen, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, T., Mora-Solano, C., & Collier, J. H. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35767 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudra, J. S., Sun, T., Bird, K. C., Daniels, M. D., Gasiorowski, J. Z., Chong, A. S., & Collier, J. H.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-30
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1557-1564
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2063823394
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.