Cited by 61CAR-T cell therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Engineering Nano‐Therapeutics to Boost Adoptive Cell Therapy for Cancer Treatment

Zheng, Chunxiong, Zhang, Jiabin, Chan, Hon Fai, Hu, Hanze, Lv, Shixian, Na, Ning, Tao, Yu, Li, Mingqiang·2021·Small Methods

Abstract

Although adoptive transfer of therapeutic cells to cancer patients is demonstrated with great success and fortunately approved for the treatment of leukemia and B‐cell lymphoma, potential issues, including the unclear mechanism, complicated procedures, unfavorable therapeutic efficacy for solid tumors, and side effects, still hinder its extensive applications. The explosion of nanotechnology recently has led to advanced development of novel strategies to address these challenges, facilitating the design of nano‐therapeutics to improve adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for cancer treatment. In this review, the emerging nano‐enabled approaches, that design multiscale artificial antigen‐presenting cells for cell proliferation and stimulation in vitro, promote the transducing efficiency of tumor‐targeting domains, engineer therapeutic cells for in vivo imaging, tumor infiltration, and in vivo functional sustainability, as well as generate tumoricidal T cells in vivo, are summarized. Meanwhile, the current challenges and future perspectives of the nanostrategy‐based ACT for cancer treatment are also discussed in the end.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smtd.202001191

Cites

222 of 222 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-scale artificial antigen-presenting cells can be used for engineering therapeutic cells for in vivo imaging, enhancing tumor infiltration, achieving functional sustainability in vivo, and producing tumor-killing T cells in vivo.

    “Engineering therapeutic cells for in vivo imaging, enhancing tumor infiltration and achieving functional sustainability in vivo, and producing tumor-killing T cells in vivo are all possible uses for multi-scale artificial antigen-presenting cells.”

    From Smart nanoparticles for cancer therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [331]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 226 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, C., Zhang, J., Chan, H. F., Hu, H., Lv, S., Na, N., Tao, Y., & Li, M.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Na, Ning
  • Tao, Yu
  • Li, Mingqiang
Venue
Small Methods
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-23
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e2001191-e2001191
ISSN
2366-9608 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133009566
Cited by
61
References
226
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Small Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program of China (2019YFA0111300)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51903256, 21907113)
  • Recruitment Program of Global Experts
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
adoptive immunotherapy, nanotherapeutics, artificial antigen-presenting cells, T cell engineering, in vivo imaging, tumor infiltration, T cell persistence, solid tumors, leukemia, B-cell lymphoma
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Humans, Lipids, Magnetics, Neoplasms, RNA, Messenger, T-Lymphocytes, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review