The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA Origami as an In Vivo Drug Delivery Vehicle for Cancer Therapy
Abstract
Many chemotherapeutics used for cancer treatments encounter issues during delivery to tumors in vivo and may have high levels of systemic toxicity due to their nonspecific distribution. Various materials have been explored to fabricate nanoparticles as drug carriers to improve delivery efficiency. However, most of these materials suffer from multiple drawbacks, such as limited biocompatibility and inability to engineer spatially addressable surfaces that can be utilized for multifunctional activity. Here, we demonstrate that DNA origami possessed enhanced tumor passive targeting and long-lasting properties at the tumor region. Particularly, the triangle-shaped DNA origami exhibits optimal tumor passive targeting accumulation. The delivery of the known anticancer drug doxorubicin into tumors by self-assembled DNA origami nanostructures was performed, and this approach showed prominent therapeutic efficacy in vivo. The DNA origami carriers were prepared through the self-assembly of M13mp18 phage DNA and hundreds of complementary DNA helper strands; the doxorubicin was subsequently noncovalently intercalated into these nanostructures. After conducting fluorescence imaging and safety evaluation, the doxorubicin-containing DNA origami exhibited remarkable antitumor efficacy without observable systemic toxicity in nude mice bearing orthotopic breast tumors labeled with green fluorescent protein. Our results demonstrated the potential of DNA origami nanostructures as innovative platforms for the efficient and safe drug delivery of cancer therapeutics in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer
Davis, M. E., Chen, Z., & Shin, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2614 · Cited by 4,233
Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology
Pinheiro, A. V., Han, D., Shih, W. M., & Yan, H. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.187 · Cited by 1,292 · cited 1×
“assembled DNA origami is one of the most promising candidates to serve as the next-generation drug delivery vehicle.(12,13)”
Background
Cited by
DNA Nanotechnology-Enabled Drug Delivery Systems
Hu, Q., Li, H., Wang, L., Gu, H., & Fan, C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00663 · Cited by 1,118
Nanomaterials in Targeting Cancer Stem Cells for Cancer Therapy
Qin, W., Huang, G., Chen, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00001 · Cited by 656
DNA nanotechnology from the test tube to the cell
Chen, Y.-J., Groves, B., Muscat, R. A., & Seelig, G. (2015) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.195 · Cited by 594
DNA Functional Materials Assembled from Branched DNA: Design, Synthesis, and Applications
Dong, Y., Yao, C., Zhu, Y., Yang, L., Luo, D., & Yang, D. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00294 · Cited by 533
DNA origami nanostructures can exhibit preferential renal uptake and alleviate acute kidney injury
Jiang, D., Ge, Z., Im, H.-J., England, C. G., Ni, D., Hou, J., Zhang, L., Kutyreff, C. J., Yan, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0317-8 · Cited by 447
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Jiang, Q., Li, N., Dai, L., Liu, Q., Song, L., Wang, J., Li, Y., Tian, J., Ding, B., & Du, Y.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6633-6643
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2332723607
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.