The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrinsically Radioactive [64Cu]CuInS/ZnS Quantum Dots for PET and Optical Imaging: Improved Radiochemical Stability and Controllable Cerenkov Luminescence
Open accessAbstract
Functionalized quantum dots (QDs) have been widely explored for multimodality bioimaging and proven to be versatile agents. Attaching positron-emitting radioisotopes onto QDs not only endows their positron emission tomography (PET) functionality, but also results in self-illuminating QDs, with no need for an external light source, by Cerenkov resonance energy transfer (CRET). Traditional chelation methods have been used to incorporate the radionuclide, but these methods are compromised by the potential for loss of radionuclide due to cleavage of the linker between particle and chelator, decomplexation of the metal, and possible altered pharmacokinetics of nanomaterials. Herein, we described a straightforward synthesis of intrinsically radioactive [(64)Cu]CuInS/ZnS QDs by directly incorporating (64)Cu into CuInS/ZnS nanostructure with (64)CuCl2 as synthesis precursor. The [(64)Cu]CuInS/ZnS QDs demonstrated excellent radiochemical stability with less than 3% free (64)Cu detected even after exposure to serum containing EDTA (5 mM) for 24 h. PEGylation can be achieved in situ during synthesis, and the PEGylated radioactive QDs showed high tumor uptake (10.8% ID/g) in a U87MG mouse xenograft model. CRET efficiency was studied as a function of concentration and (64)Cu radioactivity concentration. These [(64)Cu]CuInS/ZnS QDs were successfully applied as an efficient PET/self-illuminating luminescence in vivo imaging agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Multimodality Imaging Probes: Design and Challenges
Louie, A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003538 · Cited by 1,044
Cited by
Reactive oxygen species generating systems meeting challenges of photodynamic cancer therapy
Zhou, Z., Song, J., Nie, L., & Chen, X. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00271d · Cited by 2,098
Self-citationCompound Copper Chalcogenide Nanocrystals
Coughlan, C., Ibáñez, M., Dobrozhan, O., Singh, A., Cabot, A., & Ryan, K. M. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00376 · Cited by 930
Clearance Pathways and Tumor Targeting of Imaging Nanoparticles
Yu, M., & Zheng, J. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01320 · Cited by 886
New Generation Cadmium-Free Quantum Dots for Biophotonics and Nanomedicine
Xu, G., Zeng, S., Zhang, B., Swihart, M. T., Yong, K.-T., & Prasad, P. N. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00290 · Cited by 587
Molecular Probes for Autofluorescence-Free Optical Imaging
Jiang, Y., & Pu, K. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00506 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Guo, W., Sun, X., Jacobson, O., Yan, X., Min, K., Srivatsan, A., Niu, G., Kiesewetter, D. O., Chang, J., & Chen, X.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 488-495
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- OpenAlex
- W2322098576
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.