The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive Label-Free Method for the Relative Quantification of Proteins from Biological Samples
Abstract
Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies are broadly pursuing biomarkers as a means to increase the productivity of drug development. Quantifying differential levels of proteins from complex biological samples such as plasma or cerebrospinal fluid is one specific approach being used to identify markers of drug action, efficacy, toxicity, etc. We have developed a comprehensive, fully automated, and label-free approach to relative protein quantification from LC-MS/MS experiments of proteolytic protein digests including: de-noising, mass and charge state estimation, chromatographic alignment, and peptide quantification via integration of extracted ion chromatograms. Results from a variance components study of the entire method indicate that most of the variability is attributable to the LC-MS injection, with a median peptide LC-MS injection coefficient of variation of 8% on a ThermoFinnigan LTQ mass spectrometer. Spiked recovery results suggest a quantifiable range of approximately 32-fold for a sample protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., Levine, P. J., Fusaro, V. A., Steinberg, S. M., Mills, G. B., Simone, C., Fishman, D. A., Kohn, E. C., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07746-2 · Cited by 3,236
Cited by
Mass Spectrometry-Based Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics
Zhu, W., Smith, J. W., & Huang, C.-M. (2010) · Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology · doi:10.1155/2010/840518 · Cited by 629
Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics
Katajamaa, M., & Orešič, M. (2007) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.021 · Cited by 616
An Integrated Clinico-Metabolomic Model Improves Prediction of Death in Sepsis
Langley, R. J., Tsalik, E. L., Velkinburgh, J. C. V., Glickman, S. W., Rice, B. J., Wang, C., Chen, B., Carin, L., Suarez, A., Mohney, R. P., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005893 · Cited by 507
Quantitation in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Proteomics
Schulze, W. X., & Usadel, B. (2010) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112132 · Cited by 344
Prince, J. T., & Marcotte, E. M. (2006) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac0605344 · Cited by 259
Zhou, M., Haque, R. U., Dammer, E. B., Duong, D. M., Ping, L., Johnson, E. C. B., Lah, J. J., Levey, A. I., & Seyfried, N. T. (2020) · Clinical Proteomics · doi:10.1186/s12014-020-09285-8 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgs, R. E., Knierman, M. D., Gelfanova, V., Butler, J. P., & Hale, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-24
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1442-1450
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2006806744
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.