Cited by 160Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

An automated pipeline for high-throughput label-free quantitative proteomics

Weisser, Hendrik, Nahnsen, Sven, Grossmann, Jonas, Nilse, Lars, Quandt, Andreas, Brauer, Hendrik, Sturm, Marc, Kenar, Erhan +3 more·2013·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

We present a computational pipeline for the quantification of peptides and proteins in label-free LC-MS/MS data sets. The pipeline is composed of tools from the OpenMS software framework and is applicable to the processing of large experiments (50+ samples). We describe several enhancements that we have introduced to OpenMS to realize the implementation of this pipeline. They include new algorithms for centroiding of raw data, for feature detection, for the alignment of multiple related measurements, and a new tool for the calculation of peptide and protein abundances. Where possible, we compare the performance of the new algorithms to that of their established counterparts in OpenMS. We validate the pipeline on the basis of two small data sets that provide ground truths for the quantification. There, we also compare our results to those of MaxQuant and Progenesis LC-MS, two popular alternatives for the analysis of label-free data. We then show how our software can be applied to a large heterogeneous data set of 58 LC-MS/MS runs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr300992u

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weisser, H., Nahnsen, S., Grossmann, J., Nilse, L., Quandt, A., Brauer, H., Sturm, M., Kenar, E., Kohlbacher, O., Aebersold, R., & Malmström, L.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Life Science Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Malmström, Lars
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2013-02-22
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
1628-1644
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1977812518
Cited by
160
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
label-free quantitative proteomics, automated data processing pipeline, OpenMS, peptide quantification, protein quantification, centroiding, feature detection, high-throughput proteomics
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Automation, Chromatography, Liquid, Humans, Leptospira interrogans, Proteins, Software, Streptococcus pyogenes, Reproducibility of Results, Proteomics, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, High-Throughput Screening Assays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review