CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction Proteomics Reveals Brain Region-Specific AMPA Receptor Complexes

Chen, Ning, Pandya, Nikhil J., Koopmans, Frank, Castelo-Székelv, Violeta, van der Schors, Roel C., Smit, August B., Li, Ka Wan·2014·Journal of Proteome Research
DOI 10.1021/pr500697b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain is mediated by glutamate acting on postsynaptic AMPA receptors. Recent studies have revealed a substantial number of AMPA receptor auxiliary proteins, which potentially contribute to the regulation of AMPA receptor trafficking, subcellular receptor localization, and receptor gating properties. Here we examined the AMPA receptor interactomes from cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum by comprehensive interaction proteomics. The study reveals that AMPA receptor auxiliary proteins are engaged in distinct brain region-specific AMPA receptors subcomplexes, which might underlie brain region-specific differential regulation of AMPA receptor properties. Depending on the brain region, an interacting protein can be involved in an AMPA and a non-AMPA receptor complex.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr500697b

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SynDIG4 associates with both GluA1-and GluA2-containing AMPARs.

    “Although SynDIG4 associates with both GluA1-and GluA2-containing AMPARs (Shanks et al., 2012; Schwenk et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014) and loss of SynDIG4 leads to decreased surface expression of GluA1 and GluA2 in brain lysates (Troyano-Rodriguez et al., 2019) and reduced density of extrasynaptic GluA1 and GluA2 in cultured neurons (Matt et al., 2018), there are some aspects of SynDIG4 function”

    From Loss of SynDIG4/PRRT1 alters distribution of AMPA receptors in Rab4- and Rab11-positive endosomes and impairs basal AMPA receptor recycling (2025) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Cull-Candy S., 2006, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 16, 288, 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.012 · DOI
  2. Wenthold R. J., 1996, J. Neurosci., 16, 1982, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-01982.1996 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lu W., 2009, Neuron, 62, 254, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.027 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bassani S., 2013, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 70, 4411, 10.1007/s00018-013-1309-1 · DOI
  5. Huganir R. L., 2013, Neuron, 80, 704, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.025 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Schwenk J., 2009, Science, 323, 1313, 10.1126/science.1167852 · DOI
  7. Herring B. E., 2013, Neuron, 77, 1083, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Brockie P. J., 2013, Neuron, 80, 129, 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.028 · DOI
  9. Vandenberghe W., 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 485, 10.1073/pnas.0408269102 · DOI
  10. Tomita S., 2003, J. Cell Biol., 161, 805, 10.1083/jcb.200212116 · DOI
  11. Milstein A. D., 2007, Neuron, 55, 905, 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.022 · DOI
  12. Jackson A. C., 2011, Neuron, 70, 178, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. von Engelhardt J., 2010, Science, 327, 1518, 10.1126/science.1184178 · DOI
  14. Schwenk J., 2012, Neuron, 74, 621, 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.034 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Shanks N. F., 2012, Cell Rep, 1, 590, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Guzman S. J., 2010, Neuron, 66, 8, 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.04.003 · DOI
  17. Greger I. H., 2007, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 17, 289, 10.1016/j.conb.2007.04.007 · DOI
  18. Spijker, S.InNeuroproteomics;Li, K. W., Ed.Humana Press:New York, 2011; pp13–26.
  19. Li K. W., 2012, Proteomics, 12, 2428
  20. Chen, N.; van der Schors, R. C.; Smit, A. B.InNeuroproteomics;Li, K. W., Ed.Humana Press:New York, 2011; pp159–168.
  21. Li K. W., 2013, Amino Acids, 44, 1247, 10.1007/s00726-013-1461-9 · DOI
  22. Heisler F. F., 2014, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 5030, 10.1073/pnas.1304301111 · DOI
  23. Anggono V., 2013, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 110, 13976, 10.1073/pnas.1312467110 · DOI
  24. Kang M. G., 2012, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 28632, 10.1074/jbc.M111.336644 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Santos S. D., 2012, J. Biol. Chem., 287, 6868, 10.1074/jbc.M111.322909 · DOI
  26. Shinohara Y., 2012, Hippocampus, 22, 942, 10.1002/hipo.20950 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jonas P., 1995, Neuron, 15, 987, 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90087-X · DOI
  28. Sommer B., 1991, Cell, 67, 11, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90568-J · DOI · Paper page
  29. Burnashev N., 1992, Science, 256, 1566, 10.1126/science.1317970 · DOI
  30. Geiger J. R., 1995, Neuron, 15, 193, 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90076-4 · DOI · Paper page
  31. McBain C. J., 1993, J. Physiol., 462, 373, 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019560 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Tempia F., 1996, J. Neurosci., 16, 456, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-02-00456.1996 · DOI
  33. Iino M., 2001, Science, 292, 926, 10.1126/science.1058827 · DOI
  34. Martin L. J., 1993, Neuroscience, 53, 327, 10.1016/0306-4522(93)90199-P · DOI
  35. Coombs, I. D.; Cull-Candy, S. G.InHandbook of the Cerebellum and Cerebellar Disorders;Manto, M.; Schmahmann, J. D.; Rossi, F.; Gruol, D. L.; Koibuchi, N., Eds.Springer Press:Berlin, 2013; pp853–879.
  36. Rouach N., 2005, Nat. Neurosci., 8, 1525, 10.1038/nn1551 · DOI
  37. Jackson A. C., 2011, Neuron, 70, 178, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Shi Y., 2010, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 16315, 10.1073/pnas.1011706107 · DOI
  39. Kalashnikova E., 2010, Neuron, 65, 80, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.021 · DOI
  40. Lovero K. L., 2013, PLoS One, 8, e66171, 10.1371/journal.pone.0066171 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, N., Pandya, N. J., Koopmans, F., Castelo-Székelv, V., van der Schors, R. C., Smit, A. B., & Li, K. W.
Affiliations
Department of Molecular and Cellular Neurobiology, and ‡Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
5695-5706
ISSN
  • 1535-3893
  • 1535-3907
DOI
10.1021/pr500697b
Cited by
62
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • European Commission (242167)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (645.000.003)
  • Netherlands Institute for Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review