The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Off-Line High-pH Reversed-Phase Fractionation for In-Depth Phosphoproteomics
Open accessAbstract
Protein phosphorylation is an important post-translational modification (PTM) involved in embryonic development, adult homeostasis, and disease. Over the past decade, several advances have been made in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based technologies to identify thousands of phosphorylation sites. However, in-depth phosphoproteomics often require off-line enrichment and fractionation techniques. In this study, we provide a detailed analysis of the physicochemical characteristics of phosphopeptides, which have been fractionated by off-line high-pH chromatography (HpH) before subsequent titanium dioxide (TiO2) enrichment and LC-MS/MS analysis. Our results demonstrate that HpH is superior to standard strong-cation exchange (SCX) fractionation in the total number of phosphopeptides detected when analyzing the same number of fractions by identical LC-MS/MS gradients. From 14 HpH fractions, we routinely identified over 30,000 unique phosphopeptide variants, which is more than twice the number of that obtained from SCX fractionation. HpH chromatography displayed an exceptional ability to fractionate singly phosphorylated peptides, with minor benefits for doubly phosphorylated peptides over that with SCX. Further optimizations in the pooling and concatenation strategy increased the total number of multiphosphorylated peptides detected after HpH fractionation. In conclusion, we provide a basic framework and resource for performing in-depth phosphoproteome studies utilizing off-line basic reversed-phased fractionation. Raw data is available at ProteomeXchange (PXD001404).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cox, J., & Mann, M. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1511 · Cited by 14,855
Ong, S.-E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B., Steen, H., Pandey, A., & Mann, M. (2002) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200 · Cited by 5,574
Hebert, A. S., Richards, A. L., Bailey, D. J., Ulbrich, A., Coughlin, E. E., Westphall, M. S., & Coon, J. J. (2014) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m113.034769 · Cited by 528
Cited by
Plasma Proteomics Identify Biomarkers and Pathogenesis of COVID-19
Shu, T., Ning, W., Wu, D., Xu, J., Han, Q., Huang, M., Zou, X., Yang, Q., Yuan, Y., Bie, Y., et al. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.10.008 · Cited by 337
Phosphoproteomics in the Age of Rapid and Deep Proteome Profiling
Riley, N. M., & Coon, J. J. (2016) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04123 · Cited by 265
Mari, T., Mösbauer, K., Wyler, E., Landthaler, M., Drosten, C., & Selbach, M. (2022) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00198 · Cited by 70
Osinalde, N., Mitxelena, J., Sánchez-Quiles, V., Akimov, V., Aloria, K., Arizmendi, J. M., Zubiaga, A. M., Blagoev, B., & Kratchmarova, I. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m115.057158 · Cited by 48
Clinical protein science in translational medicine targeting malignant melanoma
Gil, J., Betancourt, L. H., Pla, I., Sanchez, A., Appelqvist, R., Miliotis, T., Kuras, M., Oskolas, H., Kim, Y., Horvath, Z., et al. (2019) · Cell Biology and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s10565-019-09468-6 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Batth, T. S., Francavilla, C., & Olsen, J. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-11-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 6176-6186
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W2321570512
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.