Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure−Activity Study on the Quinone/Quinone Methide Chemistry of Flavonoids

Open access
Awad, Hanem M., Boersma, Marelle G., Boeren, Sjef, van Bladeren, Peter J., Vervoort, Jacques, Rietjens, Ivonne M. C. M.·2001·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

A structure-activity study on the quinone/quinone methide chemistry of a series of 3',4'-dihydroxyflavonoids was performed. Using the glutathione trapping method followed by HPLC, (1)H NMR, MALDI-TOF, and LC/MS analysis to identify the glutathionyl adducts, the chemical behavior of the quinones/quinone methides of the different flavonoids could be deduced. The nature and type of mono- and diglutathionyl adducts formed from quercetin, taxifolin, luteolin, fisetin, and 3,3',4'-trihydroxyflavone show how several structural elements influence the quinone/quinone methide chemistry of flavonoids. In line with previous findings, glutathionyl adduct formation for quercetin occurs at positions C6 and C8 of the A ring, due to the involvement of quinone methide-type intermediates. Elimination of the possibilities for efficient quinone methide formation by (i) the absence of the C3-OH group (luteolin), (ii) the absence of the C2=C3 double bond (taxifolin), or (iii) the absence of the C5-OH group (3,3',4'-trihydroxyflavone) results in glutathionyl adduct formation at the B ring due to involvement of the o-quinone isomer of the oxidized flavonoid. The extent of di- versus monoglutathionyl adduct formation was shown to depend on the ease of oxidation of the monoadduct as compared to the parent flavonoid. Finally, unexpected results obtained with fisetin provide new insight into the quinone/quinone methide chemistry of flavonoids. The regioselectivity and nature of the quinone adducts that formed appear to be dependent on pH. At pH values above the pK(a) for quinone protonation, glutathionyl adduct formation proceeds at the A or B ring following expected quinone/quinone methide isomerization patterns. However, decreasing the pH below this pK(a) results in a competing pathway in which glutathionyl adduct formation occurs in the C ring of the flavonoid, which is preceded by protonation of the quinone and accompanied by H(2)O adduct formation, also in the C ring of the flavonoid. All together, the data presented in this study confirm that quinone/quinone methide chemistry can be far from straightforward, but the study provides significant new data revealing an important pH dependence for the chemical behavior of this important class of electrophiles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx000216e

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Awad, H. M., Boersma, M. G., Boeren, S., van Bladeren, P. J., Vervoort, J., & Rietjens, I. M. C. M.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2001-03-27
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
398-408
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2131538346
Cited by
160
References
1
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure−Activity Study on the Quinone/Quinone Methide Chemistry of Flavonoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx000216e
The paper
Awad, H. M., Boersma, M. G., Boeren, S., van Bladeren, P. J., Vervoort, J., & Rietjens, I. M. C. M. (2001). Structure−Activity Study on the Quinone/Quinone Methide Chemistry of Flavonoids. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx000216e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.