Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Possible Controversy over Dietary Polyphenols: Benefits vs Risks

Lambert, Joshua D., Sang, Shengmin, Yang, Chung S.·2007·Chemical Research in Toxicology

Abstract

Dietary phytochemicals including flavonoids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, tocopherols, and others have been the subject of increasing amounts of research for their potential beneficial effects as both disease preventive and therapeutic agents (1, 2).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/tx7000515

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Lambert, J. D., Sang, S., & Yang, C. S.
Venue
Chemical Research in Toxicology
Published
2007-03-16
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
583-585
ISSN
  • 0893-228X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5010
OpenAlex
W2084085849
Cited by
255
References
1
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Possible Controversy over Dietary Polyphenols: Benefits vs Risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/tx7000515
The paper
Lambert, J. D., Sang, S., & Yang, C. S. (2007). Possible Controversy over Dietary Polyphenols: Benefits vs Risks. Chemical Research in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx7000515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.