CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reconciliation in Captive Chimpanzees: A Reevaluation with Controlled Methods

Preuschoft, Signe, Wang, Xin, Aureli, Filippo, de Waal, Frans B. M.·2002·International Journal of Primatology
DOI 10.1023/a:1013293623158
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1013293623158

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The matched control design controlled for changes in the birds' behavior expected throughout the day, isolating changes due to encounters.

    “By employing this powerful “matched control” design [17,18,19], we controlled for changes in the birds’ behavior that would be expected throughout the day, due to factors such as fixed feeding times, to isolate changes due to the encounters themselves.”

    From Evaluating the Behavior and Temperament of African Penguins in a Non-Contact Animal Encounter Program (2019) · cites this paper as [18]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Baker, K. C., and Smuts, B. B. (1996). Social relationships of female chimpanzees: Diversity between captive groups. In Wrangham, R. W., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M., and Heltne, P. G. (eds.), Chimpanzee Cultures, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 227–242.
  2. Cords, M., and Aureli, F. (1993). Patterns of reconciliation among juvenile long-tailed Macaques. In M. E. Pereira, and Fairbanks, L. A. (eds.), Juvenile Primates, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 271–284.
  3. Cords, M., and Aureli, F. (2000). Reconciliation and relationship qualities. In Aureli, F., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Natural Conflict Resolution, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 177–198.
  4. de Waal, F. B. M. (1987). Tension regulation and nonreproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos (Pan pansicus). Nat. Geo. Res. 3: 318–335.
  5. de Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Appeasement, celebration, and foodsharing in the two Pan species. In Nishida, T., McGrew, W. C., Marler, P., Pickford, M., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Human Origins, Vol. 1, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp. 37–50.
  6. Kruuk, H. (1972). The Spotted Hyena, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  7. Petit, O., and Thierry, B. (1994). Reconciliation in a group of black macaques. Dodo Wildl. Preserv. Trusts, 30: 89–95.
  8. Preuschoft, S. (ed.). (1995). ‘Laughter’ and ‘smiling’ in Macaques-an EvolutionaryPerspective, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
  9. Preuschoft, S., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Dominance and communication: Conflict management in various social settings. In Aureli, F., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Natural Conflict Resolution, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 77–105.
  10. Schaller, G. B. (1972). The Serengeti Lion, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  11. Schino, G. (2000). Beyond the Primates: Expanding the reconciliation horizon. In Aureli, F., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Natural Conflict Resolution, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 225–241.
  12. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  13. van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1973). A structural analysis of the social behaviour in a semicaptive group of chimpanzees. In Vine, M. C. I. (ed.), Expressive Movement and Nonverbal Communication, Academic Press, London, pp. 75–161.
  14. van Schaik, C. P., and Aureli, F. (2000). The natural history of valuable relationshihps in primates. In Aureli, F., and de Waal, F. B. M. (eds.), Natural Conflict Resolution, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 307–333.
  15. Wrangham, R.W. (2000). Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? Ascramble competition hypothesis. In Kappeler, P.M. (ed.), Primate Males, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 248–258.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Preuschoft, S., Wang, X., Aureli, F., & de Waal, F. B. M.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Preuschoft, Signe
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Primatology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
29-50
ISSN
  • 0164-0291 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-8604
DOI
10.1023/a:1013293623158
OpenAlex
W2100918881
Cited by
69
References
54
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Journal of Primatology (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
reconciliation, chimpanzees, grooming, social behavior, age and sex differences, captive primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review