CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Further Investigation of the Work Autonomy Scales: Two Studies

Breaugh, James A.·1999·Journal of Business and Psychology
DOI 10.1023/a:1022926416628
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1022926416628

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Job autonomy is a multidimensional construct composed of scheduling autonomy, decision-making autonomy, and work methods autonomy.

    “Job autonomy can be understood as a multidimensional construct (Weber et al. 2020) which is composed of three dimensions: scheduling autonomy, including scheduling, planning, and prioritising of tasks; decision-making autonomy, using personal initiative or judgment to make decisions; and work methods autonomy, choosing procedures and methods for performing tasks”

    From Content Creators Between Platform Control and User Autonomy: The Role of Algorithms and Revenue Sharing (2023) · cites this paper as Breaugh 1999

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R&D Lab. Human Resource Management, 24, 129–146. · DOI
  2. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551–570. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Breaugh, J. A. (1989). The work autonomy scales: Additional validity evidence. Human Relations, 42, 1033–1056. · DOI
  4. Breaugh, J. A., & Becker, A. S. (1987). Further examination of the work autonomy scales: Three studies. Human Relations, 40, 381–400. · DOI
  5. Brief, A. P. & Aldag, R. J. (1978). The job characteristic inventory: An examination. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 659–670. · DOI
  6. Brown, J.S. (1975). How many workers enjoy discretion on the job? Industrial Relations, 14, 196–202. · DOI
  7. Cummings, T. G. & Molloy, E. S. (1977). Improving productivity and quality of work life. New York: Praeger.
  8. Evans, B. K., & Fischer, D. G. (1992). A hierarchical model of participatory decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control. Human Relations, 45, 1169–1189. · DOI
  9. Fine, S. A. (1968). The 1965 third edition of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles—content, contrasts and critique. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
  10. Fried, Y. (1991). Meta-analytic comparison of the job diagnostic survey and job characteristics inventory as correlates of work satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 690–697. · DOI
  11. Gerhart, B. (1988). Sources of variance in incumbent perceptions of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 154–162. · DOI
  12. Greenhaus, J. H. & Callanan, G. A. (1994). Career management. Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
  13. Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1991). The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 165–207). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  14. Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R. & Davids, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 753–762. · DOI
  15. Miller, A. R., Treiman, D. J., Cain, P. S., & Roos, P. A. (Eds.). (1980). Work, jobs, and occupations: A critical review of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  16. Nicholson, N. (1984). A theory of work role transitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 172–191. · DOI
  17. Quinn, R. P. & Staines, G. L. (1979). The quality of employment survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  18. Rousseau, D. M. (1982). Job perceptions when working with data, people, and things. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 43–52. · DOI
  19. Schmitt, N. W. & Klimoski, R. J. (1991). Research methods in human resources management. Cincinnati, OH: South-western Publishing Co.
  20. Sims, H. P., Szilagyi, A., & Keller, R. T. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 19, 196–213.
  21. Spaeth, J. L. (1979). Vertical differentiation among occupations. American Sociological Review, 44, 746–762. · DOI
  22. Spector, P. E., (1986). Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations, 39, 1005–1016. · DOI
  23. Spector, P. E., Dwyer, D. J., & Jex, S. M. (1988). Relations of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 11–19. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1991). Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 46–53. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Stone, E. F., & Gueutal, H. G. (1985). An empirical derivation of the dimensions along which characteristics of jobs are perceived. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 376–396. · DOI
  26. Sutton, R. I. & D'Aunno, T. (1989). Decreasing organizational size: Untangling the effects of money and people. Academy of Management Review, 14, 194–212. · DOI
  27. Taber, T. D., & Taylor, E. (1990). A review and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the job diagnostic survey. Personnel Psychology, 43, 467–500. · DOI
  28. Turner, A. N. & Lawrence, P. R. (1965). Industrial job and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  29. U. S. Department of Labor. (1991). Dictionary of occupational titles (4th ed. revised) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  30. Warme, B. D., Lundy, K. L., & Lundy, L. A. (1992). Working part-time. New York: Praeger.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Breaugh, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Breaugh, James A.
ORCID
Breaugh, James A.
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
357-373
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
DOI
10.1023/a:1022926416628
OpenAlex
W63541128
Cited by
216
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
employee autonomy, scale validity, part-time workers, job analysis, supervisor ratings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review