Cited by 234Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Vision and ImagingImage and Signal Denoising Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Nonlinear Statistics of High-Contrast Patches in Natural Images

Open access
Lee, Ann B., Pedersen, Kim S., Mumford, David·2003·International Journal of Computer Vision

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023705401078

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The full data set consists of roughly 8,000,000 points in nine-dimensional Euclidean space.

    “The full data set consists of roughly 8,000,000 points in E 9 .”

    From Barcodes: the persistent topology of data (2007) · cites this paper as [18]

    Section 2 (page unavailable) reports about 4.2 million optical patches and 0.79 million range patches—roughly 5 million total, not 8 million. Section 3 (page unavailable) represents each original 3 × 3 patch as a vector in nine-dimensional space, although the preprocessed data lie on a seven-dimensional sphere. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The database M consists of approximately 4.5×10^6 points on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R^8.

    “The result of this construction is a database M of ca.4.5 × 10 6 points on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R 8 .”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [41]

    Section 3 (Preprocessing; page unavailable) says the preprocessed points lie on a 7-dimensional ellipsoid in R⁹, which is transformed into a 7-dimensional sphere in R⁸. Section 2 (Optical and Range Data Sets; page unavailable) reports about 4.2 million optical patches, not approximately 4.5 million points in a database M. The source supports the general dimensional construction, but not the stated count and geometry together. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • After normalizing mean intensity and restricting to high-contrast images, the data set is projected to points on a topological seven-sphere in eight-dimensional Euclidean space.

    “By normalizing with respect to mean intensity and restricting attention to high-contrast images (those away from the origin), the data set is projected to a set of points M on a topological seven-sphere S 7 ⊂ E 8 .”

    From Barcodes: the persistent topology of data (2007) · cites this paper as [18]

  • The first two conditions (∫D f=0 and f=q(λ(x))) are analogous to the requirements that the mean intensity be zero and the contrast be one, which were imposed on the data set in Lee et al. (2003).

    “The first two conditions are analogous to the requirements that the mean intensity be zero and the contrast be one, which were imposed on the data set in Lee et al. (2003).”

    From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Lee et al. (2003)

  • In [41], indications were found that the data was concentrated around an annulus.

    “In particular, in [41], indications were found that the data was concentrated around an annulus.”

    From Topology and data (2009) · cites this paper as [41]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Gemen, D. and Koloydenko, A. 1999. Invariant statistics and coding of natural microimages. In Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vission. Published on the Web.
  2. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. New York: W.H. Freeman.
  3. Wegmann, B. and Zetzsche, C. 1990. Statistical dependence between orientation filter outputs used in an human vision based image code. In Proc. SPIE Visual Comm. and Image Processing, vol. 1360. Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 909-922.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, A. B., Pedersen, K. S., & Mumford, D.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
International Journal of Computer Vision
Published
2003-08
Volume
54
Issue
1-3
Pages
83-103
ISSN
  • 0920-5691 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1405
OpenAlex
W2120023453
Cited by
234
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Army Research Office
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
Keywords
natural image statistics, density estimation, low-dimensional manifolds, optical imagery, 3D range images, intrinsic dimension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review