Cited by 88Land Rights and ReformsConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land Reform and Land-Use Changes in the Lower Amazon: Implications for Agricultural Intensification

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1025067721480

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D., and Mueller, B. (1999). Title, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Frontiers, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. · DOI
  2. Barros, P. L. C. (1986). Estudo fitossociológico de uma floresta tropical úmida no planalto de Curuá-Una, Amazônia Brasileira, PhD Disseration, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
  3. Barros, A. C., and Uhl, C. (1996). Padrões, problemas, e potential da extração madeireira ao longo do Rio Amazonas e do seu estuário. In Barros, A. C., Veríssimo, A. (eds.), A expansão da atividade madeireira na Amazônia: impactos e perspectivas para o desenvolvimento do setor florestal no pará, Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia, Belém, Brazil, pp. 109–139.
  4. BASA (Banco da Amazônia). (1996). FNO-programas de aplicação dos recursos para 1997, Author, Belém, Brazil.
  5. Batistella, M. (2001). Landscape Change and Land-Use/Land-Cover Dynamics in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon, CIPEC Dissertation Series, No. 7, Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  6. Beaumont, P. M., and Walker, R. T. (1996). Land degradation and property regimes. Ecological Economics 18: 55–66. · DOI
  7. Benatti, J. H. (1996). Posse agro-ecológica: um estudo das concepções jurídicas sobre os apossamentos de camponeses agro-extrativistas na Amazônia, Master Thesis, Universidade do Pará, Belém, Brazil.
  8. Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure, Aldine Press, Chicago.
  9. Brondízio, E. (1996). Forest Farmers: Human and Landscape Ecology of Caboclo Population in the Amazon Estuary, PhD Dissertation, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  10. Brondízio, E. (1999). Agroforestry intensification in the Amazon estuary. In Granfelt, T. (ed.), Managing the Globalized Environment: Local Strategies to Secure Livelihoods, Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
  11. Brondízio, E. (submitted). Intensificação agricola, identidade econômica, e o pequeno produtor Amazônico: caboclos e colonos em uma perspective comparative. In Adams, C., Murrieta, R., and Neves, W. (eds.), Sociedades caboclas Amazônicas: modernidade e invisibilidade, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  12. Brondízio, E. S., McCracken, S. D., Moran, E. F., Nelson, D. R, Siqueira, A. D., and Rodriguez-Pedraza, C. (2002). The colonist footprint: Toward a conceptual framework of land use and deforestation trajectories among small farmers in the Amazonian frontier. In Wood, C. H., and Porro, R. (eds.), Land Use and Deforestation in the Amazon, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 133–161.
  13. Brondízio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., and Wu, Y. (1994). Land use change in the Amazon estuary: Patterns of caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 22(3): 249–278. · DOI
  14. Brondízio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., and Wu, Y. (1996). Land cover in the Amazon estuary: Linking of the thematic mapper with botanical and historical data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 8: 921–929.
  15. Brondízio, E. S., and Neves, W. A. (1997). A percepção do ambiente natural por parte de populações caboclas do Estuário do Amazonas: uma experiência piloto através do método de trilhas pré-fixadas. In Pavan, C. (ed.), Uma estratégia Latino Americana para Amazônia, Vol. I, Editora UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil. pp. 167–182.
  16. Brondízio, E. S., and Siqueira, A. (1997). From extractivists to forest farmers: Changing concepts of caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Research in Economic Anthropology 18: 233–279.
  17. Chibnik, M. (1994). Risky Rivers: The Economic and Politics of Floodplain Farming in Amazonia, The University of Arizona Press, Tucson. · DOI
  18. Denevan, W., and Padoch, C. (1987). Swidden-Fallow Agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon, The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
  19. Dubois, J. C. L. (1990). Secondary forests as a land-use resource in frontier zones of Amazonia. In Anderson, A. B. (ed.), Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 183–194.
  20. Fearnside, M. P. (1989). Deforestation in Brazilian Amazon: The rates and causes of forest destruction. The Ecologist 6: 214–218.
  21. Fonseca, W. D. (1996). Santarém: momentos históricos, Editora Tiagão, Santarém, Brazil.
  22. Futemma, C. (2000). Collective Action and Assurance of Property Rights to Natural Resources: A Case Study From the Lower Amazon Region, Santarém, Brazil, PhD Dissertation, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  23. Futemma, C., Castro, F., Silva-Forsberg, M. C., and Ostrom, E. (2002). The emergence and outcomes of collective actions: An institutional and ecosystem approach. Society and Natural Resources 15: 503–522. · DOI
  24. Gibson, C. C., McKean, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2000). People and Forests: Communities, Institutions, and Governance, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  25. Green, G., Schweik, C., and Hanson, M. (2002). Radiometric calibration of LANDSAT multi-spectral scanner and thematic mapper images: Guidelines for the global change community, CIPEC Working Paper CWP–02–03. Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change, Indiana University, Bloomington.
  26. Guillet, D. (1987). Agricultural intensification and deintensification in Lari, Colca Valley, Southern Peru. Research in Economic Anthropology 8: 201–224.
  27. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of commons. Science 162: 1243–1248. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hetch, S. (1993). The logic of livestock and deforestation in Amazonia. Bioscience 43(10): 687–695. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Junk, W. J. (1984). Ecology of the várzea, floodplain of Amazonia whitewaters rivers. In Sioli, H. (ed.), The Amazon Limnology and Landscape Ecology of Mighty Tropical River and Its Basin, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherland, pp. 214–243.
  30. Leroy, J.-P. (1992). Uma chama na Amazônia, Editora Vozes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  31. Mattos, M. M., and Uhl, C. (1994). Economic and ecological perspectives on ranching in the eastern Amazon. World Development 22(2): 145–158. · DOI
  32. Mausel, P., Wou, Y., Li, Y., Moran, E. F., and Brondízio, E. S. (1993). Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto International—A Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Remote Sensing 8: 2–20.
  33. May, P. (1995). Common property resources in the neotropics: Theory, management progress, and an action agenda. In Redford, K. H., and Padoch, C. (eds.), Conservation of Neotropical Forests: Working From Traditional Resource Use, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 359–378.
  34. McCracken, S. D., Brondízio, E. S., Nelson, D., Moran, E. F., Siqueira, A., and Rodriguez-Pedraza, C. (1999). Remote sensing and GIS at farm property level: Demography and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 11: 1311–1320.
  35. McCracken, S. D., Siqueira, A. D., Moran, E. F., and Brondízio, E. S. (2002). Land use patterns on an agricultural frontier in Brazil: Insights and examples from a demographic perspective. In Wood, C. H., and Porro, R. (eds.), Land Use and Deforestation in the Amazon, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 162–192.
  36. McGrath, D., de Castro, F., Futemma, C., Amaral, B., and Calábria, J. (1993). Fisheries and the evolution of resource management on the lower Amazon floodplain. Human Ecology 21: 167–195. · DOI
  37. Moran, E. F. (1981). Developing the Amazon, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
  38. Moran, E., Brondízio, E., and Mausel, P. (1994). Secondary succession. Research and Exploration 10(4): 458–476.
  39. Moran, E. F., Brondízio, E. S., and McCracken, S. D. (2002). Trajectories of land use: Soils, succession, and crop choice. In Wood, C. H., and Porro, R. (eds.), Land Use and Deforestation in the Amazon, University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp. 193–217.
  40. Murphy, L., Bilsborrow, R., and Pichón, F. (1997). Poverty and prosperity among migrant settlers in the Amazon frontier of Ecuador. Paper presented at the XIXth Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC, September 28–30. · DOI
  41. Oliveira, P. R. S., Ruffino, M. L., and Mitlewsky, B. (1994). Levantamento rápido rural no médio Amazonas: Análise sócio-econômica das comunidades de Tiningú e Murumuru-Município de Santarém, PA-Brasil, Projeto IARA–Brazilian Institute for Renewable Natural Resources and the Environment/GOPA-GTZ, Santarém, PA, Brazil.
  42. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Pichón, F. J. (1997). Settler households and land-use patterns in the Amazon frontier: Farm-level evidence from Equador. World Development 1: 67–91. · DOI
  44. RADAMBRASIL. (1976). Projeto RADAMBRASIL (programa de integração nacional): Levantamento dos recursos naturais, Vol. 10, Ministério das Minas e Energias-Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral and Projeto RADAMBRASIL, FoPSa SA-21-Santarém, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  45. Reis, A. C. F. (1979). Santarém: seu desenvolvimento histórico, Civilização Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro.
  46. Rufino, M. L. (1999). Fisheries development in the lower Amazon river. In Padoch, C., Ayres, J. M., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., and Henderson, A. (eds.), Várzea: Diversity, Development, and Conservation of Amazonia's Whitewater Floodplains. The New York Botanical Garden Press, New York, pp. 101–111.
  47. Siqueira, A., McCracken, S., Brondízio, E., and Moran, E. (in press). Women in a Brazilian agricultural frontier. In Clark, G. (ed.), Gender at Work in Economic Life, Society for Economic Anthropology Monograph Series #20, AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD.
  48. Weinstein, B. (1985). Persistence of caboclo culture in the Amazon: The impact of the rubber trade, 1850–1920. In Parker, E. P. (ed.), The Amazon Caboclo: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Studies in Third World Societies, Vol. 37, College of Williams and Mary, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 89–114.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Futemma, C., & Brondízio, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Brondízio, Eduardo S.
Venue
Human Ecology
Published
2003-09
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
369-402
ISSN
  • 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9915
OpenAlex
W149452934
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land reform, land tenure, land use change, agricultural intensification, forest conservation, deforestation, Lower Amazon, cropland expansion, labor availability, land abandonment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review